Answer:
The most problematic feature of this argument is that the adults who are persons now were not persons when they were fetuses because fetuses have no consciousness, no reasoning, and no self-awareness; in addition, even if someone argues that a fetus has the right to live, the fetus’ right to live can never outweigh the right of the woman who conceived it and wishes to abort it.
Answer:
a win-win solution
Explanation:
In simple words, A win-win agreement or solution can be understood as a close examination of both your own as well as your opponent's positions in order to reach a mutually satisfactory conclusion that offers you both as much as practicable. That will be considered a win scenario if both of you are satisfied with the outcome of the transaction.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the given case illustrates the lack of win win solution.
Explanation:
is there a table you can insert to help me better answer the question?
That statement is true.
The intention of excluding the children is to ensure that they wouldn't be exposed to any negative effects from the alteration made during the research.
But an argument could be made that if we truly want to collect the data about a certain effect<span> therapeutic agents in children, including them in research might be necessary.
</span>
