Answer:
$365,000
Explanation:
The computation of the inventory reported on the balance sheet is shown below:
<u>Product Cost NRV Lower cost</u>
A $115,000 $125,000 $115,000
B $95,000 $75,000 $75,000
C $175,000 $180,000 $175,000
Total $365,000
Answer:
FIFO LIFO Weighted average
Cost of goods sold 1,060 1,380 (1,060 + 1,380)/2 = $1,220
Ending inventory 1,380 1,060 (1,060 + 1,380)/2 = $1,220
Explanation:
Attached is the tabulated solutions
Answer and Explanation:
The red and the convertible cars would be considered similar i.e. they are perfect substitutes also the car and the convertible car would be the substitutes but it is not a perfect as the convertible car would be the subset of the car group plus the expenditure made on the convertible car would be high so here the elasticity is more
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the direct labor efficiency variance is shown below;
= Standard Rate × (Standard Hours - Actual Hours)
= $22.50 × (4,760 Units × 2 hours per unit - 8,900)
= $13,950 Favourable
Hence, the direct labor efficiency variance is $13,950 favorable
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct amount could come
Answer:
yes I agree
Explanation:
<em>because</em><em> </em><em>different</em><em> </em><em>organizations</em><em> </em><em>manufacture </em><em>or </em><em>provide </em><em>different</em><em> </em><em>goods </em><em>and </em><em>services</em><em> </em><em>so </em><em>it's </em><em>not </em><em>possible</em><em> </em><em>for </em><em>them </em><em>to </em><em>have </em><em>the </em><em>same </em><em>planning</em><em> </em><em>practices </em><em>take </em><em>for instance</em><em> </em><em>an </em><em>organization</em><em> </em><em>that </em><em>deals </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>provision </em><em>of </em><em>food </em><em>to </em><em>refugees</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>an </em><em>organization</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>deals </em><em>with </em><em>the </em><em>manufacturing</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>goods</em><em> </em><em>these </em><em>two </em><em>organizations</em><em> </em><em>will </em><em>plan </em><em>differently</em><em> </em><em>on </em><em>how </em><em>to </em><em>go </em><em>about </em><em>with </em><em>there </em><em>businesses</em><em>.</em>
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em>