1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
quester [9]
4 years ago
5

Which goals motivated the civil rights movement? Choose exactly two answers.

History
1 answer:
Likurg_2 [28]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The two correct answers are:

- Ending segregation by eliminating "Jim Crow" laws

- Protecting the equality and full citizenship of African Americans

Explanation:

The civil rights movement happened during the 1950s and 1960s and was a period in which African Americans fought for their rights.  Even though slavery had been abolished during the Civil War, the situation for African Americans was far from ideal.  A set of laws known as the "Jim Crow" laws maintained segregation between blacks and whites by using phrases such as "separate but equal".  In addition, may African Americans were not registered to vote and could not exercise one of their basic rights as American citizens.

You might be interested in
Plz help I will report if you give me nonsense answers and this is just a warning
Lelu [443]

I think its A. I'm not entirely sure but it does seem most logical.

<u>Anyways a big reason that these powers are limited is to keep society in a stable place. Tyranny brought onto any civilization over the years has led to its downfall. This balance helps keep both the government and its people under equal terms. </u>

Its not B. because this would allow tyrant rulers to keep their position putting everyone else at a disadvantage to please themselves. This simply doesn't make sense if you were to limit the government.

C. isn't a possibility either because each government only governs over said region.

D. can also be justified under my response to B. since it has the same meaning yet is worded differently/ or relates to more modern leaders I suppose.

Anyways, I hope I was helpful and good luck :D

5 0
3 years ago
Why Pokhara is called Cherrapunji of Nepal​
zhenek [66]

Answer:

Explanation:

Cause you a nxgger

4 0
4 years ago
Columbus had 3 well known ships. They were named the...
ivanzaharov [21]
Nina, Pinta, Santa Maria


(Seriously though, Pinata...Santa Claus...come on people writing the questions on the actual test, we're not that stupid XD)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To what extent does the U.S. Constitution address the ideals of the Declaration of Independence? (To a great extent, little exte
Ghella [55]

Answer:

Explanation:

As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished. Furthermore, California entered the Union as a free state and a territorial government was created in Utah.

The Missouri Compromise was struck down as unconstitutional, and slavery and anti-slavery proponents rushed into the territory to vote in favor or against the practice. The rush, effectively led to massacre known as Bleeding Kansas and propelled itself into the very real beginnings of the American Civil War.

Overview

The Compromise of 1850 acted as a temporary truce on the issue of slavery, primarily addressing the status of newly acquired territory after the Mexican-American War.

Under the Compromise, California was admitted to the Union as a free state; the slave trade was outlawed in Washington, D.C., a strict new Fugitive Slave Act compelled citizens of free states to assist in capturing enslaved people; and the new territories of Utah and New Mexico would permit white residents to decide whether to allow slavery.

Ultimately, the Compromise did not resolve the issue of slavery’s expansion; instead, the fiery rhetoric surrounding the Compromise further polarized the North and the South.

The Mexican Cession begs the slavery question

At the end of the Mexican-American War, the United States gained a large piece of western land known as the Mexican Cession.

Map depicting the area of the Mexican Cession, including the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, and portions of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.

Map depicting the area of the Mexican Cession, including the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, and portions of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.

The Mexican Cession.

The issue of whether to permit slavery in the territories organized in this new land consumed Congress at the end of the 1840s. During the war, Congressman David Wilmot introduced the Wilmot Proviso, a proposal to ban slavery in any new territory acquired from Mexico. The measure passed in the House of Representatives but failed in the Senate.

Congress was also seeking resolutions for several other controversial matters. Antislavery advocates wanted to end the slave trade in the District of Columbia, while proslavery advocates aimed to strengthen fugitive slave laws. But the most pressing problem was California: the many emigrants who had flocked to the territory upon the discovery of gold in the late 1840s had forced the question of its statehood and status as a slave or free state.

The presidential election of 1848 determined which of these issues would be tackled first. Southern Mexican-American war military hero Zachary Taylor was elected president in 1848, much to the satisfaction of southern slaveholders. Although Taylor himself owned more than one hundred slaves, he prioritized national unity over sectional interests. He called on Congress to admit California as a free state.

A ban on slave trading in Washington, DC: Antislavery advocates welcomed Congress’s ban on the slave trade in Washington, DC, although slavery itself continued to be legal in the capital.

Most Americans breathed a sigh of relief over the deal brokered in 1850, choosing to believe it had saved the Union. However, the compromise stood as a temporary truce in an otherwise white-hot sectional conflict. Popular sovereignty paved the way for unprecedented violence in the West over the question of slavery.

(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

8 0
3 years ago
What is one way the Constitution tries to prevent conflicts between federal and state governments?
atroni [7]

<u> B. It gives specific powers to the federal government.</u>

The United States Constitution grants specific powers and rights to the federal government, called "delegated powers", if it is not outlined in it, then the government should not do it. Furthermore, the Tenth Amendment establishes that all powers that aren't listed in the Constitution are granted to the people or the states. This way, it prevents conflict between federal and state government, and also prevents the government from abusing of its power.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does the word "Hellen" mean in Ancient Greece?
    9·1 answer
  • To protect settlers in new mexico, the spanish paid comanche and navajo allies to attack the _____.answer
    10·2 answers
  • Compose a paragraph that analyzes Galileo’s purpose in writing The Dialogue and society’s response to his work.
    10·2 answers
  • Why would a nation most likely use military force? Check all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • What Supreme Court decision had an impact on the abortion topic?
    13·1 answer
  • How did pope manage to defeat the Spanish settlers
    15·1 answer
  • President johnson asked for more military power in vietnam when the _______ was fired upon by n. vietnamese ships.
    10·1 answer
  • A production possibilities frontier represents the different choices or trade-offs a society faces. True. False..
    12·2 answers
  • ANSWER ASAP PLZ
    12·2 answers
  • Someone pls help me I will make you brain
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!