Question

How would the poem ""We Wear the Mask"" be different if Paul Laurence Dunbar had written it in more informal language or without as much structure?

Answer 1

Answer: It would not have been as powerful as it is

Explanation: While using less formal language and structure would have made the poem more understanble by different classes of readers, it would not have the poignant and gripping effect the formal language portrays.

It is another way of expressing the level of facade and layers of masks the African Americans had to wear in order for their behaviour to be considered socially acceptable.

While the language and tone of the poem clearly indicates the eloquence of Dunbar's literary prowess, the type of informal language as used in his more popular poems would have diminished the point he was trying to make with the pain and anguish experienced by the African Americans who at that time most likely didn't speak so formally.

Answer 2

Answer:

“We Wear the Mask” would have been interpreted as subjective and emotional if Dunbar had used more informal language and fewer structural elements. Simpler words would have been more accessible to his audience. However, the formal structure allows all Americans to relate to the poem, no matter their race. The formal structure is evident in the following lines:

Why should the world be over-wise,

In counting all our tears and sighs?

Nay, let them only see us, while

In this case, Dunbar uses an old English word, nay—not likely a word that every African American at the time knew. Dunbar uses such formal language and structure to present his point of view in an objective manner to readers.

Explanation:

From Plato