Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Significant other is the best answer
The main focus of the activities of my staff will be on how teens can have acceptable behaviors which can be used for nation building and how they can contribute positively to the nation.
Youths will be engaged in several programs within the community. These programs will recognize their strengths, and help shape them for the future.
Youths will be taught about the importance of good behaviors and the negative effects of bad behavior in the society to enable them understand that only good behavior are essential for their development as an individual and as a nation as a whole.
Read related question on:
https://brainly.ph/question/11483504
