Answer:
An either-or fallacy.
Explanation:
This fallacy occurs when, in this case, the speaker builds an argument under the assumption that there are not more than 2 outcomes or choices for that specific dilemma. In this case, Wesley's persuasive speech about school violence and gun control has "only" two outcomes: either they forbid guns from everyone except police and military or they can expect massacres in schools.
The claim on why people should use recycled water is that orange water had successful water program.
<h3>What is a claim?</h3>
It should be noted that a claim simply means the main argument in the literary work. It's simply what the author wants to point out.
In this case, the claim on why people should use recycled water is that orange water had successful water program.
The evidence that supports the claim is that only few percent said that they won't try the recycled water.
Learn more about claims on:
brainly.com/question/2748145
The option that best identifies the symbolic meaning of the law of the jungle is D. Violence and chaos.
This expression is used to describe situations where the laws are not respected and people act in any ways they want in order to survive. In this kind of chaotic situations violence is usually used because it is the only way to survive. As there is no rule, only the strongest survive.This describes exactly how animals live and that is why it is called "the law of the jungle".
< - - - The passage - - - >
For some people, global warming is a myth. For people familiar with the facts, it is no myth; it is hard truth that demands hard answers. Over the past 50 years or so, automobiles, factories, and power plants have poured many thousands of tons of carbon dioxide into our atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is what’s called a greenhouse gas. It traps the sun's radiation and increases the global temperature. During the past two decades, we have seen the hottest summers ever recorded. Also, the hottest summers have happened in the past five years. Unusual weather patterns have soaked some parts of the United States with rain. Meanwhile, the western states are fighting over water as lakes and rivers are drying up most shocking of all is the steady melting of the Arctic ice cap. Ice depths that were 300 feet are now closer to 100 feet. Ice has retreated northward into the Arctic sea for hundreds of miles. What can we conclude from all this? The answer seems to depend on your point of view. Senator Mike Blevins was quoted as saying, "Global warming is an unproved theory. We can’t afford environmental regulations that hurt the economy." Expressing a different opinion, Senator Morton Giles commented, "We’ve made a bargain with Satan we’re trading short-term profits for the misery of future generations." As arguments rage over the reality of global warming, most scientists agree on the following: global temperatures are rising, ocean temperatures are increasing and climate patterns have been altered. Many scientists also feel there’s a real threat of sea levels rising as the Polar ice caps melt. What can we do to control global warming? Proposals include the following: improve automobile mileage, develop alternative energy sources, and reduce American dependence on foreign oil.
< - - - End of the passage - - - >
I'm not entirely sure about some of the capiltalisation of some words, but the punctuation should be mostly correct.
Definitely not b or c; it feels most like a, in my opinion.
