Which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid?

1 answer:

4 0

A historian would first look at the reliability of a source - when it was published and what was happening at the time (context), who wrote it and their qualifications, any bias the author may hold, whether author sources corroborate the source, whether the author has used references, whether the source provides evidence, who the source is representative of and whether the source provides a balanced perspective

You might be interested in

What was probably the worst fear most slaves had apex?

Alina [70]

Being separated from one's family and sold

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was an effect of the Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I?

andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

The right answer is B.

Explanation:

Post-WWI Germans had the feeling the Versailles peace agreement and its conditions were unfair. There was a sense in many people that Germany had not been delivered a crushing blow in the front, withdrawal of its forces was orderly. The war reparations imposed on Germany were seen as excessive and unjust. Together with a terrible economic situation - inflation, high unemployment rate, pauperization -, those feelings contributed to the rise of the Nazis who shrewdly exploited the insatisfaction of German masses in the 1930s.

6 0

3 years ago

The tv court show judge judy is an example of which type of court? appellate courts trial courts of limited jurisdiction trial d

igomit [66]

<span>This is a trial court of limited jurisdiction. The court has a specialization in a certain type of trial (in this case, small claims for financial damages against the defendant[s]). The court also typically has limits upon the authority or sanctions that they can levy, whether it is incarceration or financial penalties, against the defendant.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

What has been the root cause of conflict in Ireland over the past 300 years? a.the people of Northern Ireland wanting home rule

Alexxandr [17]

Answer:B

Hope this helps :)

3 0

3 years ago

What was one major strength of the American Continental Army?

Alex73 [517]

Answer:They excelled in large battles fought by a mass of troops on open ground. They also had far more experience firing artillery than Americans had. The British forces were well supplied, as well. Unlike the pitifully equipped Continental army, they seldom lacked for food, uniforms, weapons, or ammunition

Explanation:

read it you will find the answer. hope this helps

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers