1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
9

what is the difference between a journal written by an eyewitness to an event and a play written about the same event?

History
2 answers:
Neporo4naja [7]3 years ago
6 0

the eye witness may exadurate a lot and a play may have studied it they will go baced off the movvvvvie or vvvviedo


timurjin [86]3 years ago
5 0
When a eyewitness journals an event, it is first-hand information, but when a play is written it is based on other information. The eyewitnesses information is usually more accurate.
You might be interested in
In the early 1900’s(close to the 19th century, beginning or the 20th), prices for beef plunged,hurting the market in Texas when
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

B. tick fever

Explanation:

mark as brainliest please :)

3 0
3 years ago
Why did Henry Grady say the south lost the civil war
kogti [31]

Answer:

When I moved to Charlotte, NC, in 1986, I visited local museums to learn about the city. One museum caught my eye – the Levine Museum of the New South. Its permanent exhibit – Cotton Fields to Skyscrapers – “uses Charlotte and its 13 surrounding counties as a case study to illustrate the profound changes in the South since the Civil War.” The “New South” – a term Atlanta newspaperman Henry W. Grady coined in a speech to the New England Society of New York on December 21, 1886 – is familiar to many American history teachers. In his speech, Grady, the first southerner to speak to the Society, claimed that the old South, the South of slavery and secession, no longer existed and that southerners were happy to witness its demise. He refused to apologize for the South’s role in the Civil War, saying, “the South has nothing to take back.” Instead, the dominant theme of Grady’s speech, according to New South historian Edward L. Ayers, “was that the New South had built itself out of devastation without surrendering its self-respect.” Tragically, Grady and most of his fellow white southerners believed maintaining their self-respect required maintaining white supremacy. 

Explanation:

Grady, then the 46-year-old editor-publisher of the Atlanta Constitution, was one of the leading advocates of the New South creed. In New York, he won over the crowd of prominent businessmen, including J.P. Morgan and H.M. Flagler, with tact and humor. He praised Abraham Lincoln, the end of slavery, and General William T. Sherman, whom he called “an able man” although a bit “careless with fire.” Grady reassured the northern businessmen that the South accepted her defeat. He was glad “that human slavery was swept forever from American soil” and the “American Union saved.” He urged northern investment in the South as a means of cementing the reunion of the war-torn nation. He claimed progress in racial reconciliation in the South and begged forbearance by the North as the South wrestled with “the problem” of African Americans’ presence in the South. Grady asked whether New England would allow “the prejudice of war to remain in the hearts of the conquerors when it has died in the hearts of the conquered?” Grady’s audience cheered his call for political and economic reunion – albeit at the cost of African American rights. The term “New South” was used in the 20th century to refer to other concepts. Moderate governors of the late 20th century – including Terry Sanford of North Carolina, Jimmy Carter of Georgia, and George W. Bush of Texas – were called New South governors because they combined pro-growth policies with so-called “moderate” views on race. Others used the phrase to summarize modernization in southern cities such as Charlotte, Atlanta, Richmond, and Birmingham, and the region’s increasing economic and demographic diversity. However, all uses of the term have suggested the intersection between economic development and racial justice in the South during Reconstruction, the Jim Crow Era, the Civil Rights Era and today. 

3 0
2 years ago
What year was Taft brought into office?
pantera1 [17]

Answer:

Taft became the president in the early 1900s. To be specific, 1908.

Add-on:

hope this was any use to you.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the historical circumstances that led to the slave trade in Latin America.
ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

Slavery in Latin America was practiced in precolonial times.

Explanation:

During the Atlantic slave trade, Latin America was the main destination of millions of African people transported from Africa to French, Portuguese, and Spanish colonies. Slavery's legacy is the presence of large Afro-Latino populations.

4 0
3 years ago
Tthis answer is wrong. The right one is 'B' ;)
Helga [31]

Answer:

What does it means,MATERIAL GWORL

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ottoman sultan mehmed 2 helped to strengthen the empire by?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following comic strips did not make its mark during the 1960s?
    8·2 answers
  • What does Churchill mean when he described russia as being “... a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma”?
    13·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP it’s important
    13·1 answer
  • In which of the following civilizations could an individual rise in social class through personal success?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the main way that African American farmers got out of the debt that they incurred as sharecroppers?
    10·1 answer
  • Mark each statement if it correctly describes facts about China during the Sui dynasty.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes NATO?
    13·2 answers
  • America is the land of invention of the hot dog, jazz, elevator,
    10·1 answer
  • Which U.S. court belongs in the empty box in the diagram?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!