1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexxandr [17]
3 years ago
9

Different borrowers have different risks of bankruptcy, and bankruptcy is costly to lenders. Therefore, lenders charge higher ra

tes to borrowers judged to be more at risk of going bankrupt.True / False.
Business
1 answer:
Phoenix [80]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

Usually all the lenders are dependent on some form of risk pricing and they charge higher rate of interest from the borrowers who has more risk of bankruptcy. The borrowers who has more risk of default will give more interest for same amount as compared to the borrower having less risk of default.

So based on the above discussion, the statement given in the question is True.

You might be interested in
Max and Eli both graduated from the police academy. Max chose to work in a large city with high crime rates, while Eli chose a j
Rina8888 [55]

Answer: Compensating differentials.

Explanation:

Compensating differential is the additional amount of money that a worker is given in order to motivate the worker to accept an undesirable job. Compensating differentials is as a result of the risk of injury, risk of future unemployment, risk of unsafe environment and it explains why there is difference in pay between different regions

Even though Max and Eli have the same skill and are members of the same trade union, Max is paid higher than Eli because Max works in an area with high crime rate while Eli's area has a low crime rate. Thus, Max higher is expected because the cost of living is higher in a city and also due to higher crime rates which means he's likely to work mire than Eli.  

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jose owns a dog whose barking annoys Jose's neighbor Amy. Suppose that the net benefit of owning the dog is worth $400 to Jose a
Alex Ar [27]

Answer: Jose has to pay $600.

Explanation:

Jose has to pay $600 to Jane for her inconvenience.

In Accordance with Coase theorem, when two conflicting parties exist, one has to ‘buy the right’ from the other party.

Which In this scenario or case, Jane has the ‘right to prevent Jose from having a dog’.

Thus, Jose has to pay compensation to Jane so that he can keep his dog and at the same time Jane is also compensated for the inconvenience which may arise later.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Purple Feet Wine, Inc., receives an average of $14,000 in checks per day. The delay in clearing is typically four days. The curr
Dominik [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is $56,000.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:

Average checks per day = $14,000

Days in clearing = 4 days

Interest rate = 0.018% per day

So, we can calculate the company's float by using following formula:

Company's Float = Average checks per day × Days in clearing

By putting the value in the formula, we get

Company's Float = $14,000 × 4

= $56,000

8 0
3 years ago
The marginal utility from the first three bananas consumed are: 19, 15, and 5 respectively. The marginal utility from the first
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:A pair of sandals.

Explanation:Its so obvious stating that the marginal utility derived from sandals is higher compared to the other two items. You maximize your utility by going for the item with highest satisfaction which is glaringly sandals.

You also maximize your utility by considering the item which is economica prudent to one needs or want.

6 0
3 years ago
Carol and Dave each purchase 100 shares of stock of Burgundy, Inc., a publicly owned corporation, in July for $10,000 each. Caro
Illusion [34]

Answer:

b. They are treated differently because the loss in value of Carol's stock is the result of a sale, while the loss in value of Dave's stock is simply a decline in value.

Explanation:

Although the stock owned by Carol and by Dave declines in value by $2,000, however Carol only has a realized and recognized loss of $2,000. The main factor in determining whether a disposition has taken place often whether an identifiable event has occurred. In the current scenario, Carol’s stock sale qualifies as a disposition and the Dave’s stock value decline does not qualify as a disposition and is simply a decline in value.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following characteristics differentiates a firm in an oligopolistic market from a firm in a perfectly competitive m
    11·1 answer
  • A job shadow takes place:
    11·2 answers
  • Res ipsa loquitur means that the burden of proof A. shifts to the defendant. B. proves the negligence. C. falls on the plaintiff
    11·2 answers
  • When executives from competing firms meet to decide which of them will submit the lowest bid on a contract, they are indulging i
    9·1 answer
  • Your coworker makes a comment about a blouse you are wearing. The comment makes you very uncomfortable. This is an example of:
    11·1 answer
  • Every decision you make in a computer program involves evaluating one or more _____ expression
    11·1 answer
  • Product placement has reached the world of live theater and opera. The difference between product placement and other forms of p
    7·1 answer
  • Why is compound interest preferable to simple interest when investing?
    12·1 answer
  • Help <br> Need for a test
    6·1 answer
  • Lowden Company has a predetermined overhead rate of 160% and allocates overhead based on direct material cost. During the curren
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!