Answer:
it is very hard to read can you at least gett a better picure and
Explanation:
28 meters / 7 seconds = 4m/s
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
The correct answer is C) intermediate scrutiny test.
A law that placed restrictions on courses girls could take in high school would be evaluated by the courts using the intermediate scrutiny test.
We are talking about the kind of test the Court uses to determine the constitutionality of a statute. When the members of the Court need to make a decision, this test is a tool they have to help them decide if a statute passed by the federal government or a state affects in a negative way some protected classes such as the case of the courses girls could take in high school.
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
A is correct, both the French and English wanted control over the Ohio River Valley, and after a dispute, it became a war.
All the other answers don't really make sense.
The events in option B happened after the French and Indian War, not before.
C and D are ridiculous, there was never really a problem about slavery or cash crop prices.
