1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir79 [104]
3 years ago
11

Pls help will mark brainliest:D

Social Studies
2 answers:
rodikova [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B, makes the most sense.

Explanation:

I hope this helps :)

kap26 [50]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is C on USA Test prep, not B.

You might be interested in
PLEASE ANSWER FAST!!
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Forgiveness is impossible. This was the thought of the philosopher Jacques Derrida, and he has a good point.

There are some things that we say are easy to forgive. But, Derrida argues, they don't actually need forgiving. I forget to reply to an email, and my friend remarks: "Oh, it didn't really matter anyway." It's not that he forgave me. He'd forgotten about the email too.Then, there are other things we say are hard to forgive, and we admire those who appear to be able to forgive nonetheless. The case of Rais Bhuiyan, who was shot by Mark Stroman, is a case in point. Bhuiyan says he forgave Stroman, and asked the Texas authorities not to execute him for his crime. But did Bhuiyan really forgive?

He writes of how Stroman was ignorant and had a terrible upbringing. He had seen signs that Stroman was now a changed man. So, it does not seem that Bhuiyan forgave his assailant. Rather, he came to understand him. He saw the crime from the perpetrator's point of view. There were reasons for the wrongdoing. That lets Stroman off the hook. It's not really forgiveness.

CS Lewis wrote: "Everyone says forgiveness is a lovely idea, until they have something to forgive." Which is again to imply that those who think they have offered forgiveness really find they don't have anything to forgive after all.The ancient philosophers appear to have thought that forgiveness is something of a pseudo-subject, too. They hardly touched on it, for all that they dwelt on all manner of other moral concerns. It is not on any list of virtues.

Take Aristotle. He wrote about pardoning people, but only when they are not responsible. "There is pardon," he says, "whenever someone does a wrong action because of conditions of a sort that overstrain human nature, and that no one would endure." When nature has not been overstrained, justice must meet wrongdoing. Forgiveness doesn't come into it.

All this calls into question a theory in evolutionary psychology. Here, the argument is that forgiveness is essential to our evolutionary success.It's because we forgive one another that we are able to live in large groups. People in collectives like cities are bound to offend one another all the time, the theory goes. It's because we are so ready to forgive and continue to co-operate that we don't, as a rule, destroy ourselves in spirals of retribution.

But I'm not sure that's right. Evolutionary doctrine itself undermines our capacity to forgive. Rather, it teaches that we learn it's in our own self-interest to co-operate. We put up with others because, at some deep level, we know we serve ourselves in so doing. That's not forgiveness.

Surely, you might be thinking, Christianity teaches forgiveness, a forgiveness that is real. But once more, that can be challenged. Take the parable of the prodigal son. You may half remember it as the paradigmatic tale of forgiveness, the father forgiving the son in spite of his profligacy. But read it again. Forgiveness is not once mentioned. The son does not ask for it. The father does not offer it. Rather, when the son returns, the father spontaneously throws a party

5 0
2 years ago
Which critique of laboratory research on memory for emotional events is concerned with generalizability
balandron [24]

Answer:

The missing options are:

A. Potential confounding variables are not always controlled din laboratory studies

.

B. Retention tests employed in laboratory studies are usually once merged with factual information rather than emotions

.

C. The intensity of emotional responses is more accurately measured after the event in laboratory studies

.

D. Memories and emotional experiences as in real life are very different from those generated in laboratory studies.

The correct answer is option D.

Explanation:  

Generalizability measures how useful is what scientists have been studying in a laboratory in comparison with the real-life since the first option is a prototype of reality that can miss valuable variables that can have an impact on the real life. With generalizability, we can see if the results of the investigation and the process that scientists used are useful in real life and can apply to other things or communities. The efficiency of generalizability depends on how well the representation of reality was in the laboratory.

3 0
3 years ago
The developing world was fair game for Cold War maneuvering by the super powers. In the 1950s, the developing world was called t
Deffense [45]

Third World countries were involved in the following events during the Cold War:

British Petroleum's loss of control of its oil production

Correct label: <u>Iran</u>

The Suez Canal Crisis involving Great Britain, France, and Israel

Correct label: <u>Egypt</u>

The United Fruit Company's nationalization

Correct label: <u>Guatemala</u>

"Nationalized the Suez Canal, jointly owned by Britain and France. Oil Company, whose refinery in Iran was Britain's largest remaining overseas asset."

<u>Explanation</u>:

The nations that are not aligned with either First World or Second World are known as Third World. The developing countries are referred as the Third World. Asia, Africa, and Latin America are some of the countries of Third World.

Cold War was actually a war with restricted rivalry after World War II. Cold war was between the countries with superpower. The Cold War is named so, as there was no usage of nuclear weapons and the countries did not fight with each other directly.

4 0
3 years ago
1. How did the U.S. help Europe and keep its isolation policy?
MaRussiya [10]
During the 1930s, the combination of the Great Depression and the memory of tragic losses in World War I contributed to pushing American public opinion and policy toward isolationism. Isolationists advocated non-involvement in European and Asian conflicts and non-entanglement in international politics.
7 0
3 years ago
Explain the importance of social socialization in human life ?
tankabanditka [31]
Socialization teaches impulse control and helps individual develop a conscience,second, socialization teaches individuals how to prepare for and perform certain social rales.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did regents affect the rise to power of military leaders in Japan
    12·1 answer
  • Why are oligarchy important to the Sparta's?
    14·1 answer
  • Instant death was usually reserved for member of the poorer classes and not the nobility. true false
    10·1 answer
  • Where did the first civilization of India arise?
    10·2 answers
  • quzilet Jane, who recently suffered a minor cardiac arrest, has been advised by her cardiologist to avoid smoking and drinking.
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the U.S. acquire Puerto Rico
    11·1 answer
  • I was wondering why was there little to no slavery In New England and the middle colonies compared to Southern????
    9·1 answer
  • What were the two antislavery societies? Hellllllppppppp :((((((
    10·1 answer
  • Have you seen any examples of landscapes outside of the US that have been radically transformed for economic reasons?
    7·1 answer
  • Which Act allows undocumented immigrants who were brought to Texas as children by their parents to pay in-state tuition if they
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!