The Depression hit hardest those nations that were most deeply indebted to the United States, Germany, and Great Britain. In Germany unemployment rose sharply beginning in late 1929, and by early 1932 it had reached 6 million workers, or about 25 percent of the workforce were unemployed.
Explanation:
<u>If they could raise money without parliament, they could rule without a parliament , Offered military protection to business ventures because the more money they made, the less the ruler had to depend on parliament.</u>
hope it helpful
<span><span>Benefits of
interdependence include how developing countries can benefit from jobs provided
by international companies, and trade. Developing countries benefit from jobs
provided by international companies that produce a lot of goods, because that
means more opportunities to make money. Families in poverty often rely on jobs
provided by retailers for clothes, jewelry, or toys from western companies. Unfortunately, a risk of interdependence lies
in that many companies take advantage of the high demand for jobs, and abuse
their power to help themselves. </span><span>Interdependence allows
western economies to take advantage of developing countries with weaker
economies. Western capitalist businesses often send jobs away to other
countries where companies pay their workers a lot less, which makes it cheaper
to get goods (like clothes and toys) produced. This side of interdependence is
dangerous because it can violate human rights. When a family in poverty lives
in an area that allows child labor, they sometimes have no choice but to put
their child to work in order to afford food and other necessities. Also, that family may feel encouraged to have
more kids to bring in more money, and that contributes to overpopulation. International
organizations have pressured countries with child labor to make laws against
it, but those laws are often ignored. Countries like India have made an effort
to protect children, but some are still forced to work to help support their
families.</span></span>
<span>Another risk of
interdependence can be expressed through a dilemma in many countries in Africa:
the decision to either produce crops for food or for profit. African
governments, influenced by multinational corporations, worked to increase the
production of cash crops. Cash crops help to grow the economy, but take up
large portions of land that would instead be used for food, which forces some
countries to import expensive food to feed their growing population. Another
issue surrounding cash crops: if the weather is particularly bad for a season,
whether due to droughts or bad storms, the country suffers greatly. When a
country depends heavily on one commodity to attract trade and bring in profit,
and there becomes a shortage of that crop, that does not bode well for the
economy of that country. <span> However, there are still countries and areas
that benefit from interdependence due to trade. </span>An example of a
beneficial relationship between countries due to interdependence and trade lies
in African countries like Nigeria, where rising oil prices due to high demands
benefits the economy. When countries trade natural resources, like oil, found
in their geographical location, it has a positive effect on their economy.
Trading with Asian industrial giants such as China and India also has a
positive effect on economies in Africa. Countries in similar economic and
geographical positions also profit from the oil trade in addition to minerals
and other commodities. The growth that nations in Africa are experiencing
attracts outside investments that are helpful when building a strong,
successful infrastructure. </span>
Your Answer: is the emeritus William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and professor of political science and law at Stanford. He is the author of six books, including Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996), which won the Pulitzer Prize in History. And, he is a past president of the Society for the History of the Early American Republic.
Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law. He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice. He’s the author of Originalism and the Good Constitution co-written with John McGinnis.
Jeffrey Rosen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress “to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.”
Explanation: Your Explanation In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like. On this episode, we explore the questions: How did the unique constitutional visions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists influence the drafting and ratification of the Constitution? And how should we interpret the Constitution in light of those debates today? Two leading scholars of constitutional history – Jack Rakove of Stanford University and Michael Rappaport of the University of San Diego School of Law – join host Jeffrey Rosen. Hope this Helps! :D Happy Early Christmas! :D
- Freedom of religion
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom of press
- the right of the people to peaceably assemble
- the right to petition the Government for redress grievances
hope that helps.
