1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
4 years ago
11

To what extent was the Mexican War a “justifiable” war and not simply an excuse perpetrated upon both the American and Mexican p

eople in order to seize land from a weak neighbor
someone answer this briefly... I'm trynna get some sleep
History
1 answer:
kramer4 years ago
7 0

The main justification for the war against Mexico comes from "Manifest Destiny", the belife that God wanted the United States to expand from one ocean to the other, to spread democracy, freedom and western values across the continent. It was a sense of "mission" that the American settlers had in the middle of the XIX century.

You might be interested in
Which describes a consequence of the Viking raids into other European countries?
Lisa [10]

The Vikings’ mythology, craftsmanship, literature, and seafaring skills became a part of the European inheritance.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Over which of the following domains of governance do state governments NOT have authority?
Solnce55 [7]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the best option is "public finance" since this is done at the federal level.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An externality is an unintended side effect that benefits or harms a third party not involved in the activity. Please select the
kotegsom [21]
Answer: TRUE

<span>"Externality" is the term which is used to describe an unintended side effect that affects a third party that had no involvement in the activity that caused the side effect. The side effect is called a positive externality if it benefits the third party, while it is called a negative externality if it is harmful to the third party.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
3. Who were the Tatars?​
inn [45]

Answer:

They were people who spoke Turkish, they lived mainly in west-central russia

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
British Policies: Sugar Act
Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

Explanation:

i hate history

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What women questioned the religious athouraty of puritan ministers in the late 1500s?
    7·1 answer
  • To what degree was american industrialization made possible by foreign contributions, such as immigration and stolen mill plans?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is guaranteed by the fifth amendment
    5·1 answer
  • What was the Indian Removal Act? What did it lead too?
    9·2 answers
  • Darnell correctly compares the values of the digits in 644.66. Select the comparison Darnell could have made. A The value of the
    8·1 answer
  • I suck at History....please halp mehhhhh
    15·1 answer
  • Which document being with the words “we the people of the United States”
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think the leaders of the newly independent "Gold Coast" changed the
    5·1 answer
  • History and theory of bigfoot.
    13·1 answer
  • 11.
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!