The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the lesson notes or the link to them, to know what you are talking about. Neither the articles of the authors Arquilla and Weimann.
However, trying to help, we did some research and can comment on the following.
It is true that enhanced communication has allowed for the growth of "networks" of organizations. The pro of these new networks is that it allows people who have similar thoughts or opinions, to have a formal channel of communication to express their points of views and fight for their causes.
The con of these new actors on the international stage is that not all have the best intentions in mind. Some of them can use the new networks for negative purposes as in the case of terrorist groups. For instance, John Arquilla affirms that most of these groups are formed to protest against the policies of governments or are anti-status quo.
Some of these groups promote an environmental agenda, civil rights, support any particular ideology or country in disgrace, or simply critique the performance of a public official or government.
The answer I beileve would be all of the above as progressives helped economics, social welfare, politically, and helped with the overuse of alcohol.
<h2>Answer:</h2>
The concept of voting in the Progressive Era is frequently connected to women's rights. Though, in the idea of state reformations, there were several modifications made to the voting method in the 20th century.
The three features approached in this issue will be the secret ballot, recall, and direct primary. These features affect the administration of the state in different forms. Although overall they strike the Progressive Era in a singular style. They provide a more durable form of management because they set more power in the support of the voter and give the states and cities truly representative. It makes the authorities of cities and states stronger and give a new method to run the political system still practiced today. First of all, the secret ballot was established to guarantee privacy at a ballot box when voting so party chiefs do not know who anyone voted to.
Answer:
Because he wants his audience to know Vietnam.
Explanation:
King addressed an American audience. He knew that this public did not, in fact, know Vietnam, but they relied on biased and often incorrect information, which painted Vietnam in a different image than it really was. King wanted to bring true information that would show Vietnam as a country that did not deserve to be attacked, much less "helped" in the way it was happening. For that reason, he gave so many details about the political history of Vietnam.
