Firstly, to answer this question, we need to understand the definition of each of the terms that they're asking about! Here are some quick, by no means complete, definitions:
Utopian: The belief that the current society one resides in can be improved to a perfect society; the desire to change the society one resides in to a "better" version of what it is
Socialism: The belief that the workers should control the workforce
Communism: The belief that everything should be split among everybody and that no social classes should exist (while one of the main reasons for the existence of social classes being the uneven division of materials)
Now that we have that out of the way, let's just try to find one system for each that contradicts the choice:
A. Well, communism has been known to want/do two things. The first being a worldwide "sharing" association, with everybody being on board with communism, and the second being communists have used industrialization to assist with the achievement of their goal. So, with those combined, communism eliminates that choice from being feasible.
B. Utopias, for the most part, condone the use of violence, as they believe that is a factor that causes issues in modern societies. So, Utopian beliefs eliminate that choice.
D. Communism believes that the government needs full control of the system at first, then give the power to the people. So, that leads to the elimination of D.
We are now only left with C. Why is that the answer? Well, Utopias most often change the capitalistic system, Socialists want control and more equality, and communism is the cited opposition to socialism. Therefore, C would be the correct choice. <span />
The case of <em>Brown vs Board of Education of Topeka</em>, which took place in 1954, was a major breakthrough for the Civil Rights Movement, as it paved the way for an ending to inequality and segragation, especially in public schools and it influenced many legal cases thereafter. Among the many important things achieved through this ruling was the overturn of several other court rulings, especially those made in <em>Plessy vs Ferguson</em> (1986), which allowed states to establish separate schools for black and white children and <em>Mendez vs Westminster</em>, which allowed for the setting of separate facilities. The case was decided finally by the Supreme Court in a unanimous vote and after it it was settled that the installation of separate public schools, and segregation of children regarding their race in school, was a direct violation of the terms set by the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourtheenth Amendment.
Answer: On February 5, 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt announces a controversial plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges, allegedly to make it more efficient. Critics immediately charged that Roosevelt was trying to “pack” the court and thus neutralize Supreme Court justices hostile to his New Deal.
Maybe a pep rally, to bring people together and for each grade's students to be a team and get along, and to also have fun . A pep rally can be used as a rally to bring people to get along and together.
Answer:
George Washington was The first president
