1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
8

One of the most controversial turning points in history was the decision made by U.S president Harry S. Thurman to use atomic we

apons on japan the lone remaining Axis power at the conclusion of world war 11 in your opinion was the decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a military necessity? If not was It justifiable for a reason other than military necessity ?
History
2 answers:
Lelechka [254]3 years ago
8 0
Yes this was necessary because the Japanese had showed they would not surrender even if it meant full lose of military soldiers. Other justifiable reasons would be that the U.S. had already lost many lives to the war and it would not a good move to keep sending soldiers in to lose their lives when they could just drop the atomic bomb.
irina [24]3 years ago
5 0
Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a military necessity because from other reports, the Japanese were about to surrender anyway. It was justifiable because we were scared and we acted because we were threatened.
You might be interested in
Entertainment and education were two of the beneficiaries of the _____.
Fiesta28 [93]
Generally speaking, entertainment and education were two of the beneficiaries of the "<span>America Revolution", since this Revolution instilled a democratic and "free" system in which these two subjects could flourish. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a monopoly?
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

monopolies are more harmful than beneficial because they stop the ability for competition. Competition gives the consumer more choice to choose what to buy but a monopoly makes only one product available.

3 0
3 years ago
It was common for slave traders to force slaves to eat and punish them for not eating because
kotykmax [81]

The answer would be B. The more slaves that survive, the more profit that the slave traders made. In this case, most slave traders were urgently wanting large amounts of profit. So, the traders would do as much as it took to keep as many as they could alive throughout the voyage.

When slaves die, the trader loses profit.

3 0
3 years ago
What percentage of the total southern population was african american?
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

14th century

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which TWO religions originated in India?
fgiga [73]
A if I am correct please correct me if I am wrong
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did reformer William Lloyd Garrison wish to change?
    6·1 answer
  • What do federal, unitary and confederation systems of government have in common?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the six-day war
    5·2 answers
  • Who is the first president of the United States.
    6·2 answers
  • The establishment of the _______brought representative government to England.
    15·1 answer
  • In North America, what "fossils clues" in layers A and B indicate the kind of environment that existed when these rock layers we
    7·1 answer
  • What did the u.s do to break the the blockade
    5·2 answers
  • What impact did the magna Carta and English bill of rights have on the framing of the colonial government
    9·1 answer
  • As president, John Adams tried to reduce foreign influence over the U.S.
    15·2 answers
  • 7. How many states and territories altogether did not allow slavery?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!