1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
8

One of the most controversial turning points in history was the decision made by U.S president Harry S. Thurman to use atomic we

apons on japan the lone remaining Axis power at the conclusion of world war 11 in your opinion was the decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a military necessity? If not was It justifiable for a reason other than military necessity ?
History
2 answers:
Lelechka [254]3 years ago
8 0
Yes this was necessary because the Japanese had showed they would not surrender even if it meant full lose of military soldiers. Other justifiable reasons would be that the U.S. had already lost many lives to the war and it would not a good move to keep sending soldiers in to lose their lives when they could just drop the atomic bomb.
irina [24]3 years ago
5 0
Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a military necessity because from other reports, the Japanese were about to surrender anyway. It was justifiable because we were scared and we acted because we were threatened.
You might be interested in
What factors were common in 19th-century European revolutions? Choose three correct answers.
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

The rise of nationalism

The desire for national self-rule

The desire to unify territories

8 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP PLSS!!⚠️⚠️
Bond [772]

Answer:

whats wrong?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following groups did the New Deal aid the least
Lemur [1.5K]
Blacks were the least group for aid.
4 0
3 years ago
Hiram Rhodes Revels, Blanche K. Bruce, and Jonathan Clarkson Gibbs were
SIZIF [17.4K]

Hiram, Blanche, and Jonathan were all the officials belonging to African American community in the era of Reconstruction.

<h3>What is meant by slavery?</h3>

Slavery is the practice followed by the white people to treat black people as their slaves.

Hiram and Blanche were previously treated as slaves and then becoming the senators in the state of Mississippi. Jonathan was the secretary in the state of Florida who came to help in the reconstruction of the US country.

Therefore, none of the options is accurate as the option A and option B are totally incorrect and rest of the two are partially correct.

Learn more about the slavery in the related link:

brainly.com/question/9331183

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Its actually affirmative action.
sweet-ann [11.9K]
What is your question
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were company executives affected by the reduction in workers’ wages?
    13·2 answers
  • Henry Clay was a strong supporter of ?
    6·1 answer
  • What is an enlightened despot
    8·2 answers
  • Marcus Garvey advocated for
    15·2 answers
  • What was social Darwinism
    12·1 answer
  • What was the Holy book of Moses
    12·1 answer
  • Commodore Dewey was involved in which of the following?
    15·2 answers
  • What ethic group did the immigration laws of the 1800's and early 900's discriminate against ?
    13·1 answer
  • What effect did ida Tarbells book have?
    5·1 answer
  • Was the goal of Westward Expansion to expand slavery into the western territories?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!