1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
8

One of the most controversial turning points in history was the decision made by U.S president Harry S. Thurman to use atomic we

apons on japan the lone remaining Axis power at the conclusion of world war 11 in your opinion was the decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a military necessity? If not was It justifiable for a reason other than military necessity ?
History
2 answers:
Lelechka [254]3 years ago
8 0
Yes this was necessary because the Japanese had showed they would not surrender even if it meant full lose of military soldiers. Other justifiable reasons would be that the U.S. had already lost many lives to the war and it would not a good move to keep sending soldiers in to lose their lives when they could just drop the atomic bomb.
irina [24]3 years ago
5 0
Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a military necessity because from other reports, the Japanese were about to surrender anyway. It was justifiable because we were scared and we acted because we were threatened.
You might be interested in
What was the importance of operation barbarossa during wwii?
kondor19780726 [428]
It was the turning point where the German troops failed defeat the Soviet Union
7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best completes the list showing the steps in the presidential
sdas [7]
The answer I believe would be b
4 0
3 years ago
What were the events that led to the renaissance in italy?
vladimir2022 [97]
The Grow of Trasero , artículo Andrés tecnology
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes the impact of the Cuban Missile Crisis?
I am Lyosha [343]

The statements referred by the question are:

a) It convinced the United States to dismantle its nuclear weapons.

b) It proved that a naval blockade was not an act of war.

c) It showed Cuba that communism should be stopped.

d) It brought the world dangerously close to nuclear war.

The correct statement is D. Historians agree the Missile Crisis was the closest the world got to have a nuclear war between the U.S. and USSR. Nothing before or after this came as close to be direct aggression from one of these countries against the other.

Statements A and C never happened: the U.S. has nuclear weapons until today, and Cuba didn't give up on communism.

Statement B doesn't fit the facts around the Missile Crisis. The naval blockade didn't lead to war only because the U.S. was defensive.

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following was a goal of progressive
AlexFokin [52]

provide the following please

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • King Philip's War.
    7·1 answer
  • Which Act led to the disintegration of the Whig Party?
    8·2 answers
  • Why do you think george washington 's presidency was so important in the development of the yung nation?
    6·1 answer
  • What are 5 significant events that Marie Curie did??
    13·1 answer
  • WHAT IS THE TERM FOR THE BELIEF THAT SPIRITS FILL THE NATURAL WORLD
    11·2 answers
  • Answer both plzzz ASAP ASAP!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • what was the name given too a series of laws that closed the boston harbor, required colonists to british soliders in their home
    7·1 answer
  • what best explains why archaeologists Believe that Native Americans living during the Mississippian Believed in some sort of aft
    7·1 answer
  • Similarities and differences between the north american and south american civilizations
    11·1 answer
  • What if Hitler won WW2
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!