D in my opinion but I’m am truly sorry if you get it wrong
The Answer Would Be The Third One C They Would Want To Inform The Reader Like Let Him/Her Know
~Hope This Helps :)
Need More Help Just Ask
Explanation:
You can write a good rebuttal by addressing the other side's argument and then write your counterclaim.
Ex:
Thesis: Banning SeaLand is necessary because of its unethical treatment of animals.
Many SeaLand proponents believe that the theme park benefits animals because it provides millions of dollars to wildlife foundations. However, what they don’t tell the public is that these wildlife foundations are actually organizations that funnel the money back into SeaLand—so actually, SeaLand appears to be donating charity, but it is actually simply donating to itself.
True, because assumptions are not facts; they could be skewed or totally incorrect.
