The argument that James is making in this speech kings are god’s representatives on earth and should not be challenged. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the argument?</h3>
Generally, the argument is simply defined as a hot or furious discourse of opposing or divergent viewpoints.
In conclusion, In this lecture, James argues that monarchs are god's ambassadors on Earth and should not be disputed.
Read more about the argument
brainly.com/question/9860191
#SPJ1
Answer:
A pls tell me if its wrong but hoped i helped
Explanation:
Answer: the executive branch
Explanation: The Constitution gives the Senate the power to approve, by a two-thirds vote, treaties negotiated by the executive branch. The Senate does not ratify treaties.
They made most of there money growing crops such as tabbacco, cotton, and lumber.
Answer:
They weren't treated like humans, but more as a commodity, something that can be used and abused without care. In the North, people were against slavery and working to end it, so naturally, you'd go somewhere safer, where you're actually seen as a human being with feelings and unalienable rights.
