The answer to your question is b
Answer:
The pater familias, also written as paterfamilias (plural patres familias), was the head of a Roman family. The paterfamilias was the oldest living male in a household, and exercised autocratic authority over his extended family. The term is Latin for "father of the family" or the "owner of the family estate".
Explanation:
Amid World War II, about 350,000 ladies served in the U.S. Military, both at home and abroad. They incorporated the Women's Airforce Service Pilots, who on March 10, 2010, were granted the renowned Congressional Gold Medal. In the interim, across the board male enrollment left expanding openings in the modern work constrain. Somewhere in the range of 1940 and 1945, the female level of the U.S. workforce expanded from 27 percent to almost 37 percent, and by 1945 about one out of each four wedded ladies worked outside the home.
Let understand that the Sugar Act (1764) and Stamp Act of (1765) were legislation passed by British legislators to impose new tax levies to the American colonies.
The tax collected are used by British to build security, improve US and also serves as wealth to the colonial masters as well.
The introduction of various Tax Acts tries to increase the tax rate on every goods. This legislation angered the colonist and continued to build up their revolution intent.
The burden of the tax were becoming too high for the colonist, thus leading them the oppose any new Tax Act providing guideline for collection of Tax.
Therefore, in conclusion, the collection of tax from the colonist serves as a motivation for the American revolutionary movement during the period or 1763 to 1776.
Learn more about American revolution here
<em>brainly.com/question/24735028</em>
Answer:
In the scopes trial, Thomas Scopes was tried in court because he tried to teach the theory of evolution in Tennessee. The state was highly religious at that time, so they did not want anyone to teach theory of creation that contradicted the Bible.
On the surface, this might be seen as a case that debated evolution and creationism. But, it actually much more than that. it actually will determine whether the State has the ability to suppress knowledge/ideas in order to promote a certain Agenda.
This case became a national debate and eventually the court prohibited the states to force the teaching of a certain religion in public schools.
