Answer:presently as the case might have it we have the the Anasazi, the Hohokam, and the Mogollon
Explanation:
The correct answer is C) Rome, because Roman law forces the accuser to have a burden of proof.
Based on what happens to Citizen X, he lives under the government of Rome.
When we are talking about the term Burden of Proof it means the accuser has to prove his claims. So, in simpler terms, it’s the obligation of the accuser to present the elements that support his claim. In the case of the example, Citizen X lives in Rome because he has to present the proofs that his co-worker stole the watch. There were no proofs, then, the co-worker was found not-guilty in the absence of proofs.
Answer:
Kublai instituted a class system that placed Mongols on top, followed by Central Asians, Northern Chinese, and finally Southern Chinese. The latter two classes were more heavily taxed, especially to fund Kublai’s failed – and expensive – military campaigns.
These campaigns included attacks on Burma, Vietnam and Sakhalin, which successfully resulted in these regions becoming tributary states of the empire with tributes that were, unfortunately, dwarfed by the costs of the individual campaigns.
Yes, they were. They were told to bring only enough things for a few days and leave the rest, as they would return in a few days.
