Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
Yea I read it couple years back
It is a comical story that has a 'quest' archetype throughout. In most quests, only one hero is seeking a solution or a resolution all along with the story. but this story has its characters moving together in the search. It was because of the carelessness of the head spotter. Their tails were stiff due to prolonged dry weather. Then it rained, softening the tails. Then came brutal winter hat again froze their tails very stiff.
Explanation:
At last, came stormy weather, the wind kept blowing until the last tail fell off. Not all animals were sad about losing their tails as it did not affect them all in the same way.
The grinding away of rock by another rock is called erosion.
