If you hold this security to maturity, your yield to maturity is <u>9.89%</u> while your rate of return is <u>9%</u>.
<h3>What is the yield to maturity?</h3>
The yield to maturity (YTM) refers to the total rate of return earned by a bond when it makes all interest payments and repays the original principal.
YTM is equal to a bond's internal rate of return (IRR) if the bond were held to maturity.
<h3>Data and Calculations;</h3>
Face value of security = $500
Price paid today = $455
Yield to maturity = (Face Value/Current Price) x (1/Years to Maturity) - 1
= $500/$455 x 1/1 - 1
= 0.0989
OR
Yield in dollars = $45 ($500 - $455)
= 0.0989 ($45/$455 x 100)
Rate of return = 9% ($45/$500 x 100)
Thus, if you hold this security to maturity, your yield to maturity is <u>9.89%</u> while your rate of return is <u>9%</u>.
Learn more about yield to maturity and rate of return at brainly.com/question/5524579
Answer:
nominal tax shield in year 10: 6,812 dollars
present value of the tax shield: 1,837.49
Explanation:
the nominal tax shield in year 10:
We look into the MACRS table for 10-years property class: 6.55%
The depreciation expense for this year is 260,000 x 6.55% = 17,030
Then this produces a tax shield of 40% 6,812
The nominal tax shield at year 10 is 6,812 dollars
considering time value of money today this tax shield is worth:
PV: 1,837.49
Answer:
Enforceable
Explanation:
-Jolie made a promise not to to proceed with legal claims thereafter in exchange for <em>monetary compensation</em> when she accepted the release agreement.
-The release agreement is legally binding and shields Kirby from future legal claims.
-The release is thus enforceable.
Early personal computer users remember the cumbersome, user-unfriendly "DOS" system. When Apple introduced System 1 and Microsoft introduced Windows, both of which were much easier to use, these new products diffused rapidly because of their relative advantage
.
Option A
<u>Explanation:
</u>
A product's dominance and market appeal over similar items. A competitive advantage is usually accomplished by giving better value to customers through either reducing prices or delivering added quality and service that justify higher costs.
That idea is based on consumer brand and product perceptions and does not necessarily reflect the actual characteristics of this product or service. The definition helps companies to consider that customers would choose to use this product or whether a rival would rather remain faithful to the already existing product.
