Complete Question
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, citizens remain unemployed for an average of 15.9 weeks before finding their next job (June, 2008). Suppose you want to show that Louisiana has been effective in getting their unemployed back to work sooner. You take a random sample of 50 citizens who were unemployed six months earlier and ask them to report the duration. You find that the average time spent unemployed was 13.4 weeks with a sample standard deviation of the time unemployed is 6.7 weeks.
1 Which of the following statements is the correct alternative hypothesis?
2 The test statistic for testing the hypothesis is
a. -2.64
b. -2.32
c. -2.11
d. -1.28
e. none of these are correct
Answer:
1
The alternative hypothesis 
2
The test statistics
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean value for time citizens remain unemployed is 
The sample size is n = 50
The sample standard deviation is 6.7 weeks.
The sample mean value for time citizens remain unemployed is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis 
Generally test statistics is mathematically represented as
=> 
=>
Answer:2(x+1/2x)+3=105
Step-by-step explanation: that is how i got my answer. If not a similar answer i would go with 2x+3=3x+105.
You can automatically eliminate the first answer. The second one has a random 5, so eliminated. and the last one just isn't correct.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Rearrange the equation by subtracting what is to the right of the equal sign from both sides of the equation :
10*y-(80)=0
Pull out like factors :
10y - 80 = 10 • (y - 8)
Solve : 10 = 0
This equation has no solution.
A a non-zero constant never equals zero.
Solve : y-8 = 0
Add 8 to both sides of the equation :
y = 8
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The first thing we are going to do is to fill in the other angles that we need to solve this problem. You could find ALL of them but all of them isn't necessary. So looking at the obtuse angle next to the 35 degree angle...we know that those are supplementary so 180 - 35 = the obtuse angle in the small triangle. 180 - 35 = 145. Within the smaller triangle we have now the 145 and the 10, and since, by the Triangle Angle-Sum Theorem all the angles have to add up to equal 180, then 180 - (10 + 145) = the 3rd angle, so the third angle is 180 - 155 = 25. Now let's get to the problem. If I were you, I'd draw that out like I did to keep track of these angles cuz I'm going to name them by their degree. In order to find d, we need to first find the distance between d and the right angle. We'll call that x. The reference angle is 35, the side opposite that angle is 12 and the side we are looking for, x, is adjacent to that angle. So we will use the tan ratio to find x:
Isolating x:
so
x = 17.1377 m
Now we have everything we need to find d. We will use 25 degrees as our reference angle, and the side opposite it is 12 and the side adjacent to it is
d + 17.1377, so that is the tan ratio as well:
and simplifying a bit:
and a bit more:
d + 17.1377 = 25.73408 so
d = 8.59, rounded