1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rusak2 [61]
3 years ago
6

A woman eats chips and dips and burgers and fries and drinks a couple of shakes. afterward, she goes to the gym and does 90 minu

tes of aerobics, spends an hour on the stair stepper, and then does weights for another hour. she also does not eat for 72 hours. the set of assumptions underlying her behavior would lead to a diagnosis of:
Business
1 answer:
MariettaO [177]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is non-purging-type bulimia nervosa. The non-purging type of bulimia nervosa is being defined or characterized as individuals who are likely to compensate dietary fasting or the individual is likely to engage to having to perform excessive exercising.

You might be interested in
The belief that you have to come up with something no one has ever done before to build a successful business is
mote1985 [20]

Simple; It's wrong. Many companys do the same thing and are still successful.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
f interest rate parity (IRP) exists, then triangular arbitrage will not be possible. A. true. B. false.
Levart [38]

Answer:

A. True

Explanation:

Arbitrage refers to a situation wherein a gain is made owing to price discrepancy or unevenness in two markets. The rule for arbitrage is to buy from the markets where price is less and sell in the markets where price is higher.

Triangular arbitrage occurs wherein 3 different currencies are involved and the exchange rates are not uniform i.e a discrepancy exists and interest rate parity does not hold true.

Interest rate parity refers to the concept wherein the disparity between two currency exchange rates is adjusted by the respective interest rates of the two countries. When interest rate parity exists, no arbitrage is possible as markets are fairly priced.

3 0
3 years ago
Turnbull Co. has a target capital structure of 58% debt, 6% preferred stock, and 36% common equity. It has a before-tax cost of
OLga [1]

Answer:

Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) will be higher by 0.64% if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Turnbull Co. has a target capital structure of 58% debt, 6% preferred stock, and 36% common equity. It has a before-tax cost of debt of 8.2%, and its cost of preferred stock is 9.3%. If Turnbull can raise all of its equity capital from retained earnings, its cost of common equity will be 12.4%. However, if it is necessary to raise new common equity, it will carry a cost of 14.2%. If its current tax rate is 40%, how much higher will Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) be if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings? (Note: Round your intermediate calculations to two decimal places.)

The explanation to the answer is now given as follows:

Step 1: Calculation of WACC when all of its equity capital is raised from retained earnings

This can be calculated using WACC formula as follows:

WACCR = (WS * CE) + (WP * CP) + (WD * CD * (1 - T)) ………………… (1)

Where;

WACCR = Weighted average cost of capital when all of its equity capital is raised from retained earnings = ?

WS = Weight of common equity = 36%, or 0.36

WP = Weight of preferred stock = 6%, or 0.06

WD = Weight of debt = 58%, or 0.58

CE = Cost of equity = 12.4%, or 0.124

CP = Cost of preferred stock = 9.3%, 0.093

CD = Before-tax cost of debt = 8.2%, or 0.082

T = Tax rate = 40%, or 0.40

Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:

WACCR = (0.36 * 0.124) + (0.06 * 0.093) + (0.58 * 0.082 * (1 - 0.40))

WACCR = 0.078756, or 7.8756%

Rounding to 2 decimal places, we have:

WACCR = 7.88%

Step 2: Calculation of WACC if it raises new common equity

This can also be calculated using WACC formula as follows:

WACCE = (WS * CE) + (WP * CP) + (WD * CD * (1 - T)) ………………… (2)

Where;

WACCE = Weighted average cost of capital if it raises new common equity = ?

WS = Weight of common equity = 36%, or 0.36

WP = Weight of preferred stock = 6%, or 0.06

WD = Weight of debt = 58%, or 0.58

CE = Cost of equity = 14.2%, or 0.142 (Note: This is the only thing that has changed compared to what we have in Step 1 above.)

CP = Cost of preferred stock = 9.3%, 0.093

CD = Before-tax cost of debt = 8.2%, or 0.082

T = Tax rate = 40%, or 0.40

Substituting the values into equation (2), we have:

WACCE = (0.36 * 0.142) + (0.06 * 0.093) + (0.58 * 0.082 * (1 - 0.40))

WACCE = 0.085236, or 8.5236%

Rounding to 2 decimal places, we have:

WACCE = 8.52%

Step 3: Caculation of how much higher will Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) be if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings.

This can be calculated as follows:

Percentage by which WACC is higher = WACCE - WACCR

Percentage by which WACC is higher = 8.52% - 7.88%

Percentage by which WACC is higher = 0.64%

Therefore, Turnbull’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) will be higher by 0.64% if it has to raise additional common equity capital by issuing new common stock instead of raising the funds through retained earnings.

5 0
2 years ago
ASAP I need help.
san4es73 [151]
Progressed, succeeded, achieved, determined, advanced
6 0
2 years ago
Susan williams runs a small flagstaff job shop where garments are made. the job shop employs eight workers. each worker is paid
slavikrds [6]

Labour Productivity is basically the worth of goods produced by each labour or collectively in an hour, This can be expressed in the formula below:

Labour Productivity per hour of work=\frac{Worth of Goods Produced}{Total Number of Labour Hours}

In order to find worth of goods we shall use below Formula:

Worth of Goods= Sale Price per Unit*Number of Units Sold

In given case there are 2 types of goods sold as below

1. Proper Garments

Worth of Goods Sold= $210*78 Garments

Worth of Goods Sold=$16380

2. Seconds

Worth of Goods Sold= $100*54

Worth of Goods Sold= $5400

Total Goods Sold= $5400+$16380

Total Worth of Goods=$21780

Total Hours Worked= No of Workers*Hours Worked each Worker

Total Hours Worked= 8*45

Total Hours Worked=360 Hours

Labour Productivity=\\ \frac{21780}{360}

Labour Productivity=$60.5 per Hour


3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • All unethical behavior is criminal. True or False
    10·1 answer
  • Maria is a hard-working college sophomore. One Sunday, she decides to work nonstop until she has answered 100 practice problems
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is LIKELY to have the biggest strategy-shaping impact on on-demand transportation providers such as Uber
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following layouts seeks the best personnel and machine utilization in repetitive or continuous​ production? A. ​Pro
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me. ...​
    7·1 answer
  • The cost of preferred stock is different from the cost of _____ because there is no maturity date on which principal must be pai
    15·1 answer
  • If the government places a $2 tax per bag of potato chips on the producers, what would the consumers of potato chips observe? a.
    8·1 answer
  • The people in an economy have $10 million in money. There is only one bank that all the people deposit their money in and it hol
    6·1 answer
  • Differentiation for most consumer brands can be based on.
    7·1 answer
  • A scale used to weigh produce at a market has markings every 0.1 kg. which measurement for the mass of a dozen apples is correct
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!