Answer:
The answer is option C "Police search a home without a search warrant"
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution secures individual protection, and each resident's entitlement to be liberated from nonsensical government interruption into their people, homes, organizations, and property whether through police stops of residents in the city, captures, or searches of homes and organizations.
Law makers have set up lawful protections to guarantee that cops meddle with people's Fourth Amendment rights just under restricted conditions, and through explicit techniques.
The Fourth Amendment gives protection to people during searches and confinements, and keeps unlawfully held onto things from being utilized as proof in criminal cases. The level of security accessible in a specific case relies upon the idea of the detainment or capture, the attributes of the spot looked, and the conditions under which the hunt happens.
Your answer is going to be A. Because an act had been signed to help encourage the building of this railroad.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
Answer:
Technically Martin Luther King and his brothers of the union, All congregated to march down the bridge to freedom.
The plan was from Malcolm X, who was shot for refusing the kkk elites president who made Martin stand down.
After Malcolm's death, Martin realized he was wrong and carried out Malcolm's whole reason for the march. In the end, Many blacks were injured and some had die.
But the Supreme Court finally noticed the problem and saw that this was wrong. So black men were now able to vote and enter the same restaurant as white men with the "Civil Rights Act".
happy to help
Answer: b. King George III
Details:
Jefferson provided a list of "facts to be submitted to a candid world" to demonstrate that the British king, George III, had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states which were declaring their independence).
Jefferson's list included items such as:
- The king refused to assent to laws that were wholesome and necessary for the public good.
- The king had forbidden colonial governors to enact laws or implement laws without his assent (which, as the prior point noted, he was in no hurry to give).
- The king forced people to give up their rights to legislative assembly or forced legislative bodies to meet in difficult places that imposed hardships on them.
- The king dissolved legislative assemblies and then refused for a long time to have other assemblies elected.
- The king obstructed justice in the colonies and made judges dependent on his will alone for their salaries and their tenure in office.
- The king kept standing armies in place in the colonies in peacetime, without the consent of the colonial legislatures.
- The king imposed taxes without the colonists' consent.
These and additional items listed in the Declaration were meant to support the colonies' position that tyranny was standard operating procedure by the British monarchy, and therefore revolution was justified.
