1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ad libitum [116K]
3 years ago
10

1) Which statement best describes economic conditions in the Weimar Republic after World War I?

History
1 answer:
yawa3891 [41]3 years ago
3 0

Correct answer: D) The German government printed extra money to pay protesting workers, causing hyperinflation.

Explanation:  The Treaty of Versailles (1919), signed after the end of World War I, was very harsh in the terms imposed against Germany.  Germany was forced to pay large reparation payments to the countries that it had fought against in the war.  Along with accepting full responsibility for causing the war, Germany was ordered make monetary payments for the damage caused "as a consequence of the aggression of Germany and her allies."   Occupation of territories in the Rhine and Ruhr valleys was threatened if Germany did not make good on reparations payments.

The Germany economy was crippled by the payments it was supposed to make, and its government (as the Weimar Republic) was unable to keep up with the payments.  In 1923, French troops occupied the Ruhr region.  Germans living in the region responded with civil disobedience and a workers strike.  The Weimar Republic government sided with the workers and printed bank notes to pay the workers while they were on strike.  Printing additional money with no real economic foundation to support the increased money supply led to extreme inflation.  The German economy got worse and worse.

Then came the Great Depression, beginning in 1929.  The Great Depression was worse in Germany than in America.  The hyperinflation in Germany got so bad so that their currency became essentially worthless.  I've attached a photo which shows children playing with stacks of money as if they were building block toys -- because they weren't really worth anything as money.

The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  

You might be interested in
How is this idea represented in Article 3 different from the divine right to rule that absolute monarchs like Louis XVI used to
olasank [31]

Answer:

Article 3 of the United States Constitution describes the U.S. judicial branch, including the Supreme Court, the federal courts, and the state courts.

Explanation:

This idea is different from the right of absolute monarchs like Louis XVI, because as the adjective implies, the power of these monarchs was absolute: they made the laws, they executed the laws, and they interpreted the laws. As Louis XVI himself once said "l'etat c'est moi", which is I am the state in French. The French state and Louis XVI were essentially the same thing.

3 0
3 years ago
What are The similarities between appi community and black American community fight for civil wars
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

Like the activists of the African American civil rights groups, their goal was complete racial equality. The main difference between the two movements was that some supporters of Black Power were prepared to use violent methods to achieve these goals.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The division of books in the Hebrew Scriptures for Jewish people is abbreviated to what
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Torah

Explanation:

(Many strongly traditional Jews reject both Bible and Testament and choose Tanakh, an acronym for the three divisions of the sacred writings: Torah, the five books of Moses; Nebiim, the books of the prophets, and Ketubim, the other sacred writings.)

6 0
4 years ago
What are some land forms of New York City
Naily [24]
Adirondack mountains, Niagra falls (which is shared with Canada),  and the Adirondack Forest Preserve are only a few landforms.
3 0
3 years ago
Describe the significance of Grant’s meeting Lee at the Appomattox Courthouse. please
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

HE GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT

See "The Surrender" painting by Keith Rocco

On the morning of April 9, while General Robert E . Lee realized that the retreat of his beleaguered army had finally been halted, U. S. Grant was riding toward Appomattox Court House where Union Cavalry, followed by infantry from the V, XXIV, and XXV Corps had blocked the Confederate path. Lee had sent a letter to Grant requesting a meeting to discuss his army's surrender and this letter overtook Grant and his party just before noon about four miles west of Walker's Church (present-day Hixburg). Grant, who had been suffering from a severe headache, later remembered that upon reading Lee's letter the pain in his head had disappeared. He stopped to prepare his reply to Lee, writing that he would push to the front to meet him.

The location of the meeting was left to Lee's discretion. Lt. Colonel Orville E . Babcock and his orderly, Capt. Dunn, took Grant's reply and rode ahead. Babcock found Lee resting under an apple tree near the Appomattox River. After reading Grant's letter, Lee, his Aide-de-Camp Lt. Colonel Charles Marshall, and Private Joshua O. Johns rode toward Appomattox Court House accompanied by Federal Officers Lt. Col. Babcock and Capt. William McKee Dunn. Marshall and Johns rode ahead of Lee in order to find a place for the generals to confer. As Marshall passed through the village he saw Wilmer McLean in the vicinity of the courthouse. He asked McLean if he knew of a suitable location, and McLean took him to an empty structure that was without furniture. Marshall immediately rejected this offer. Then McLean offered his own home. After seeing the comfortable country abode, Marshall readily accepted and sent Private Johns back to inform General Lee that a meeting site had been found.

Lee arrived at the McLean house about one o'clock and took a seat in the parlor. A half hour later, the sound of horses on the stage road signalled the approach of General Grant. Entering the house, Grant greeted Lee in the center of the room. The generals presented a contrasting appearance; Lee in a new uniform and Grant in his mud-spattered field uniform. Grant, who remembered meeting Lee once during the Mexican War, asked the Confederate general if he recalled their meeting. Lee replied that he did, and the two conversed in a very cordial manner, for approximately 25 minutes. The subject had not yet gotten around to surrender until finally, Lee, feeling the anguish of defeat, brought Grant's attention to it. Grant, who later confessed to being embarrassed at having to ask for the surrender from Lee, said simply that the terms would be just as he had outlined them in a previous letter.

The terms would parole officers and enlisted men but required that all Confederate military equipment be relinquished. The discussion between the generals then drifted into the prospects for peace, but Lee, once again taking the lead, asked Grant to put his terms in writing. When Grant finished, he handed the terms to his former adversary, and Lee -- first donning spectacles used for reading-- quietly looked them over. When he finished reading, the bespectacled Lee looked up at Grant and remarked "This will have a very happy effect on my army." Lee asked if the terms allowed his men to keep their horses, for in the Confederate army men owned their mounts. Lee explained that his men would need these animals to farm once they returned to civilian life. Grant responded that he would not change the terms as written (which had no provisions allowing private soldiers to keep their mounts) but would order his officers to allow any Confederate claiming a horse or a mule to keep it. General Lee agreed that this concession would go a long way toward promoting healing. Grant's generosity extended further. When Lee mentioned that his men had been without rations for several days, the Union commander arranged for 25, 000 rations to be sent to the hungry Confederates. After formal copies of the surrender terms, and Lee's acceptance, had been drafted and exchanged, the meeting ended.

In a war that was marked by such divisiveness and bitter fighting, it is remarkable that it ended so simply. Grant's compassion and generosity did much to allay the emotions of the Confederate troops. As for Robert E. Lee, he realized that the best course was for his men to return home and resume their lives as American citizens.

Before he met with General Grant, one of Lee's officers (General E. Porter Alexander) had suggested fighting a guerilla war, but Lee had rejected the idea. It would only cause more pain and suffering for a cause that was lost. The character of both Lee and Grant was of such a high order that the surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia has been called "The Gentlemen's Agreement."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are three discoveries from the Lewis and Clark expedition ?
    15·1 answer
  • What was "The March of the Flag"?
    14·2 answers
  • 4. Explain the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison Case.
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Burmese and Vietnamese independence movements have in common?
    10·1 answer
  • How long does it take for the Europeans settlements to creat over fishing ​
    14·1 answer
  • Why did many wealthy Englishmen favor the development of colonies in america
    8·2 answers
  • What city did Edward R. Murrow report from during World War II?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the Constitutional act of 1982
    8·2 answers
  • How did Diocletian and Constantine give new life to the late Roman Empire
    12·1 answer
  • What was the main issue surrounding the Compromise of 1850?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!