Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer: ke = D1/Po + g
0.1025 = D1/57.50 + 0.06
0.1025-0.06 = D1/57.50
0.0425 = D1/57.50
D1 = 0.0425 x 57.50
D1 = $2.444
Explanation: Cost of equity is equal to dividend in 1 year's time divided by the current market price plus the growth rate. Other variables were provided in the question except the dividend at the end of the year (D1).
Thus, D1 becomes the subject of the formula. The appropriate cost of equity is $2.44. The correct answer is B.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Affective component has been displayed as mood and feelings have been touched as a result of the feedback Janice got from her boss.
Cheers
Worker's Compensation, because the injury occurred by an employee in the course of performing their job.
Firms that take voluntary actions to address the ethical, social, and environmental impacts of its business operations are involved in a Corporate Social Responsibility. Hope this helps. <span />
