Answer:
The value of a product is determined by the ratio of its quality to its price. The higher the value of a product, the better will be its competitive position. ... The value of a product is determined by the ratio of its quality to its price. The higher the value of a product, the better will be its competitive position.
Answer:
Cash= 87,910 + 9.3*direct labor hour
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The variable overhead rate is $9.30 per direct labor-hour. The company's budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead is $106,140 per month, which includes depreciation of $18,230.
Cash= (106,140 - 18,230) + 9.3*direct labor hour
Cash= 87,910 + 9.3*direct labor hour
Answer:
Project portfolio management
Explanation:
Project portfolio management refers to managing the portfolios of the project i,e used by the project managers and the management who manages the project.
This is useful to analyze the risk and return in each project
Moreover, it is a process of choosing, supporting and managing the collection of firm projects in a systematic way
Hence, the third option is correct
Suppose in 2020, you purchase a house built in 2014. The value of the services of the real estate agent. the value of the services of the real estate agent would be included in the gross domestic product for 2020 This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the gross domestic product?</h3>
Generally, Final products and services—i.e., those purchased by consumers—are included in GDP, which estimates the value of goods and services produced in a specific period of time.
In conclusion, Imagine that in the year 2020 you decide to buy a home that was constructed in 2014. The price that should be paid for the real estate agent's services. The total value of the real estate agent's services would be included in the calculation of the gross domestic product for the year 2020.
Read more about gross domestic product
brainly.com/question/9201016
#SPJ1
The missing word in the blank is :
small
hence the completed paragraph is:
The coach is weighing a slightly increased risk of losing against a slightly decreased risk of injury to the star quarterback. this weighing of trade-offs is an example of marginal thinking, because the star quarterback was in for most of the game, and the coach's decision concerns <u><em>small</em></u> shifts in probabilities with the game nearly over.
