Some argue that this is a misguided question. They say that Locke’s political philosophy is not based on natural law at all, but instead on natural rights, like the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. This is probably the greatest controversy in Locke interpretation today. Natural law theories hold that human beings are subject to a moral law. Morality is fundamentally about duty, the duty each individual has to abide by the natural law. Thomas Hobbes created a new approach when he based morality not on duty but on right, each individual’s right to preserve himself, to pursue his own good—essentially, to do as he wishes.
Is Locke a follower of Hobbes, basing his theory on right rather than natural law? What difference does it make? One characteristic of a rights theory is that it takes man to be by nature a solitary and independent creature, as in Hobbes’s “state of nature.” In Hobbes’s state of nature, men are free and independent, having a right to pursue their own self-interest, and no duties to one another. The moral logic is something like this: nature has made individuals independent; nature has left each individual to fend for himself; nature must therefore have granted each person a right to fend for himself. This right is the fundamental moral fact, rather than any duty individuals have to a law or to each other. The priority of individual right reflects our separateness, our lack of moral ties to one another. According to Hobbes, one consequence of this is that the state of nature is a “war of all against all”: human beings are naturally at war with one another. Individuals create societies and governments to escape this condition. Society is not natural to man, but is the product of a “social contract,” a contract to which each separate individual must consent. The sole purpose of the contract is to safeguard the rights of each citizen.
This is the basic recipe for the political philosophy of liberalism—Locke’s philosophy. Locke speaks of a state of nature where men are free, equal, and independent. He champions the social contract and government by consent. He goes even farther than Hobbes in arguing that government must respect the rights of individuals. It was Locke’s formula for limited government, more than Hobbes’s, that inspired the American Founding Fathers. But what is the basis of Locke’s theory? Is it natural law or Hobbesian natural right? The Founding Fathers, in the Declaration of Independence, speak of both natural rights and natural laws. Locke does likewise. Natural law and natural right may be combined, but if they are, one must take precedence over the other. Either the individual’s right, or his duty to moral law, must come first. hope that helps!
A.
Explanation: Iraq had moved troops into Saudi Arabia's neighbor, Kuwait. from about 1,000,000 million dollars to nearly 5,000,000 million dollars.
Answer:
okay first one about the frog and Hosta plant -
i think this is kind of like behavioural adaptations. This means that the animal its self will have to adapt to there surrounding in order to survive. for example, the dart frog doesnt have much adaptation to do becasue he naturally gives predetors a warning to back off because he might be poisionous. But for the Hosta Plant it had learned to adapt to its surrounding by becoming more closer together to attract more sunlight to survive.
And for the last one -
The tucan might have had some physical adaptations. its beak is used for reaching fruits off of trees and many other things. I guess i could say the same thing for the plant it had made a physical change to iself so that the excess water can turn into mold.
so so so so so so srry if this is wrong i was also doing my homework as well that might be why its taken so long srry and
peace.
These were the essentials in the first century church: the communion supper was observed (Acts 20:7; 1 Corinthians 11:25–26), prayers were offered up (1 Corinthians 14:15–16), songs were sung to the glory of God (Ephesians 5:19), a collection or offering was taken (1 Corinthians 16:2), and the Scriptures were read, preached and taught (Acts 20:7; Colossians 4:16; 2 Timothy 4:2).
I do not think he listed all in one passage, but he did let the churches know throughout his letters what they needed to do to hold a worship service. (the biblical passages you see, Acts was not written by Paul but it narrates his part of his life and ministry from chapters 9 thru 28).
They are important because besides praising God passionately, their faith was shared with others and more people were been converted to Christianity, so they needed to be nurtured spiritually to grow in their faith and know God better with the help of the church leaders through the Scripture.
Hope it helps! If you have another question, comment this answer. I’d be more than glad to help.
Woman became the leaders of the to largest labor unions (B)
