Answer:
The amount of time spent playing video games.
Explanation:
When doing research, we usually come across two different types of variables. One is the independent variable and the other one is the dependant variable.
- The independent variable is the one that we, as researchers, can control and that has an effect on another variable.
- The dependant variable is the variable that we can't control and that is affected by the independent variable.
Therefore, we can control the independent variable but not the dependant variable. And the effect we will be observing will take place in the dependent variable.
In this example, the hypothesis is that the greater amount of time teenagers spend playing video games, the higher their grades in math. We can see that the hypothesis states that <u>the math grades will be AFFECTED by the amount of hours teenagers spend playing video games</u>. In other words, <u>the amount of time spent playing will have an </u><u>effect</u><u> on the grades.</u> Therefore, the independent variable is The amount of time spent playing video games.
Alright, basic research basically means finding out an answer to fill in the knowledge that people don't have or we have while applied research basically means to seek the question with an answer and solve the problem. hope this explains it :))
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
In northern Africa by the Nile river. I'm not sure if this the answer you're looking for though.