1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew-mc [135]
3 years ago
12

What was Abigail’s attitude about the colonial boycott? Select the best answer. She agreed with the boycott but could not take a

ction to support it. She believed that only people in the country should follow the boycott. She was willing to use her own resources to support the boycott. She did not believe the boycott was worth the trouble.
History
2 answers:
anygoal [31]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C) she was willing to use her own resources to support the boycott.

Abigail’s attitude about the colonial boycott was "she was willing to use her own resources to support the boycott."

Abigail Adams (1744-1818) always supported his husband John Adams and was an active female in the Revolution times. Although she was not a member of the Daughters of Liberty, she always supported the movement and the participation of women in the freedom of America. Abigail Adams is considered one of the most intelligent women of her time.

MariettaO [177]3 years ago
6 0

She was willing to use her own resources to support the boycott

hope this helped

You might be interested in
O
mylen [45]

Answer:

The Supremacy Clause states that the Constitution is above all state and federal laws.

Explanation:

The Supremacy Clause provides that the constitution and laws of the United States, as well as international treaties concluded by the United States, are the supreme law of the country. This clause also obliges state judges to be governed by the US Constitution, laws, and international treaties, even if state constitutions and laws are contrary to federal law. It is contained in Article VI of the US Constitution.

The distinction between the jurisdiction and powers of the Union and the states in the US Constitution is based on the concept of dualistic federalism, which provides that the US as a whole and the states have their own powers, within which they are completely independent. In such a situation, conflicts may arise between the Union and the states, for the resolution of which it is necessary to determine the level of public authority to which primacy will be given.

3 0
4 years ago
Who was the Napoleon?
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799).

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP ME ALOT OF POINTS WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

look below since I think the answer gives limited amounts of characters

Explanation:

If I was in Truman's shoes and I lost the ships from Pearl Harbor I would definately fight back, there is no way I'm going to stay quiet from someone hurting my country and costs lives and lots of money. The options were Raid Japan, Invade Japan, bomb in an inhabitant area or a populated area.

<em>Pros and cons of</em><em> raiding Japan</em><em> </em>

<em>pros- Japan will see us as a threat and no longer want to mess with the US </em>

<em>CONS-More lives will be lost and will lose a future ally. </em>

<em />

<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>invading Japan</em>

<em>pros- Japan will be ours and they will have to surrender </em>

<em>CONS- could cost more lives lost than needed. </em>

<em />

<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>Bombing inhabited area</em>

<em>pros- </em><em>No one gets hurt and less lives will be lost </em>

<em>cons- Japan might cause another bombing </em>

<em>Pros and cons of </em><em>Bombing populated area</em>

<em>pros- Japan will fear us and must surrender </em>

<em>cons- many lives will be lost .</em>

<em />

I believe Truman was better off dropping the bomb to prove to other countries to never mess with the USA again and if he didn't Japan might cause another bombing.

5 0
3 years ago
Where would you choose to live? Why
Elodia [21]

Answer:

i would choose to live in a small city because you have everything you need and there isnt a ton of people and im sure not a lot would happen so its kind of peaceful

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which European country originally settled the colony that would later become known as New York?
mart [117]
The Netherlands originally settled the colony now known as New York.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • France revolted against
    6·1 answer
  • A narrow piece of land that connects North and South America is the Isthmus of Suez.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the relationship between Greek and roman culture ?
    7·1 answer
  • Why was Atlanta significant to the Union and whose leadership led to its seizure by the Union?
    9·1 answer
  • The delegates at the Constitutional Convention decided to create a national executive branch to be led by: Group of answer choic
    14·1 answer
  • Differing from the Umayyad caliphs, the Abbasid rulers
    6·1 answer
  • Where did the enlightenment movement began?
    8·1 answer
  • Why might breaking a canon law be worse for an individual than breaking a governmental law
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true of the Scottsboro Boys?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes nat turner’s beliefs
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!