1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
3 years ago
5

Following Jay’s Treaty, George Washington’s approval rating, to borrow a modern phrase, plummeted and there was even talk in the

House of impeaching him. Why was this treaty so offensive to some?
History
2 answers:
Nimfa-mama [501]3 years ago
6 0

Even though both sides of the bargain achieved something, the treaty became a point of controversy because it could be viewed as an agreement that <em>favored the british</em>, being that a lot of issues caused by them, such as wartime damages, illegal capture of american ships and conflicts with the indians caused by the british occupation. The british agreed with leaving said posts but only after one year and a half. In the treaty there was also a ton limit to the trade that americans could have, making profiting from the pelt trade almost impossible.

Also, the treaty was configured in a way that seemed to favor the Federalists to the detriment of the opposing party, the Jeffersonians (who where against the british, believing that Britain opposed the values of the American people, prefering to support France whenever international issues called for U.S. contribution), who rallied against Washington, Hamilton and Jay. The Federalists where in favor of the british, believing that going against the british in this matter could lead to war against them.

Luba_88 [7]3 years ago
5 0
<span>The Pro-French believed that it didn't protect American sailors from being captured and seized by the British. They were worried that they were leaning more towards the British side and becoming more anti-french.</span>
You might be interested in
Why was neutrality a difficult policy for the United States to maintain?
Murrr4er [49]
Depending on the time period, America had a difficult time remaining neutral for several reasons.

World War I
America had a difficult time remaining neutral during World War I because of Germany's actions. For example, the German submarine sank the Lusitania, a boat that contained over 100 American citizens. Along with this, the Germans were also caught trying to make a secret alliance with Mexico. This was exposed when the Allied powers intercepted the Zimmerman Telegram. Considering these factors, the government felt the US had no choice but to break their neutrality and enter World War I.

World War II
The US had a difficult time maintaining neutral in World War II due to the violence and rise of dictators like Hitler. Along with this, the US was also attacked by the Japanese military. The Japanese military bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. This attack on a military base prompted the US to break their policy of neutrality in order to enter World War II.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
American wars had what effect on industry
topjm [15]

The impact of America's wars on industrial production has varied dramatically, depending on the particular war and the stage of industrial development.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help I don't know which one
34kurt
I am pretty sure your answer is correct :)
7 0
3 years ago
Write a cer about why there was conflict over immigrants
aliina [53]

Answer:

Migration is variously characterized as an important determinant of violent conflict and political instability, national power, imperial expansion, ethnic conflict, radicalism, terrorism, environmental degradation, and economic growth or stagnation. In high immigration receiving states such as Australia and the United States—among the world's most inclusive migrant incorporation regimes—immigration increasingly complicates foreign policy making choices, and may present challenges to each host nation's internal cohesion.. Issues such as dual nationality, social exclusion, multiculturalism, and fear of international terrorism—especially in a post-9/11 context—generate considerable political heat and public debate.

2nd paragraph: Combatants in the immigration debate start from very different world views – not only emphasizing different values but almost speaking different languages. To avoid destructive backlashes, reformers must understand and respect the values and perspectives of all groups involved in public debates.Immigration—and public policies to manage it—arouses strong emotions and fierce social and political battles, not just in the United States but in most other countries across the world. Why is this true? Each nation has its own issues that inspire or enrage, of course, but there are widespread, underlying patterns that can be identified and taken into consideration by reformers.

3 0
3 years ago
With at least 300 words, discuss the things you learned in this lesson (renaissance) and their relevance to you. Tell how you ca
lord [1]
300 WORDSSSS????? uhmmm
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was a positive effect of capitalism
    13·2 answers
  • Which president is given credit for the construction of the Panama Canal?
    11·2 answers
  • Explain why Egypt was a source of Anglo-French rivalry.
    9·1 answer
  • Which best explains why many people in Austria supported German annexation
    8·2 answers
  • There was much _____________ used in the ancient writings, to produce a visual narrative of what had happened.
    6·2 answers
  • Which feature is characteristic of a market economy?
    10·1 answer
  • The Mongols, White Huns, and Mughals severely persecuted _____.
    7·2 answers
  • What group of people in New Mexico suffered greatly from the onset of the Great Depression?
    15·1 answer
  • Which Muslim cartographer created a map of the world?
    9·2 answers
  • What was created to provide emergency relier to freed slaves and white war refugees
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!