1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andreev551 [17]
3 years ago
5

Following Jay’s Treaty, George Washington’s approval rating, to borrow a modern phrase, plummeted and there was even talk in the

House of impeaching him. Why was this treaty so offensive to some?
History
2 answers:
Nimfa-mama [501]3 years ago
6 0

Even though both sides of the bargain achieved something, the treaty became a point of controversy because it could be viewed as an agreement that <em>favored the british</em>, being that a lot of issues caused by them, such as wartime damages, illegal capture of american ships and conflicts with the indians caused by the british occupation. The british agreed with leaving said posts but only after one year and a half. In the treaty there was also a ton limit to the trade that americans could have, making profiting from the pelt trade almost impossible.

Also, the treaty was configured in a way that seemed to favor the Federalists to the detriment of the opposing party, the Jeffersonians (who where against the british, believing that Britain opposed the values of the American people, prefering to support France whenever international issues called for U.S. contribution), who rallied against Washington, Hamilton and Jay. The Federalists where in favor of the british, believing that going against the british in this matter could lead to war against them.

Luba_88 [7]3 years ago
5 0
<span>The Pro-French believed that it didn't protect American sailors from being captured and seized by the British. They were worried that they were leaning more towards the British side and becoming more anti-french.</span>
You might be interested in
To what category do popular sovereignty, limited government, federalism, republicanism, individual rights, separation of powers,
sineoko [7]

All of them are Principles of Government.

<em>Individual rights</em> are unalienable rights that are guaranteed to all citizens.

<em>Popular sovereignty</em> means that the authority of the government comes from the people that elect their representatives.

<em>Separation of Powers</em> is a separation of responsibility and limitations that are given to each branch. The system of <em>check and balances</em> is also a part of this, giving each branch a way to limit other branch and control it.

<em>Federalism</em> is a system of government that divides the power into national and state governments.


6 0
3 years ago
What muslim knowledge and technology was brought back to Europe as a result of the crusades​
Andreas93 [3]
Although it was unsuccessful, the Crusades introduced Europeans to the luxury of the Muslim civilization. When the Crusaders brought home silks, porcelain, spices and other goods, demand for these things in Europe began to grow, especially as the emerging bourgeois class of Europeans became a market for these luxury goods.
3 0
3 years ago
Why is the line-item veto considered to be unconstitutional?
sasho [114]
D) The veto violates Congressional rights granted by separation of Powers.
6 0
2 years ago
79. Who was President during World War 1?"
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

Woodrow Wilson was president during world war 1 ..

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List and describe at least four of the five provisions from the English Bill of Rights.
marin [14]
<span>1.The pretended power of suspending the laws and dispensing with laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
</span><span>2.The freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;
3.</span><span>by assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;
</span>4.<span>by levying taxes for the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative as if the same was granted by Parliament;</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the 1920s, Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover, while serving Presidents Harding and Coolidge, encouraged the creation of tr
    15·1 answer
  • Confucius lived during<br>I took test..... B. the Zhou dynasty, when rival lords vied for power.​
    13·1 answer
  • What level of government has primary responsibility for defining marriages and other civil contracts?
    12·1 answer
  • What does the trend toward descriptive representation suggest about what constituents value in their legislature? How might Cong
    10·1 answer
  • What is a type of french poetry
    12·2 answers
  • According to those who envisioned total development of the continent in the nineteenth century, America would eventually become
    11·1 answer
  • People who belonged to the Second estate, where did they live or reside?
    14·1 answer
  • PLZ help w question 2 and 3 plzzz.
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Hitler originally sign a non-aggression pact with Poland?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the unemployment rate at the start of the Great Depression? When did unemployment reach its peak during the Depression?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!