Answer:
1. Part that includes subject and main action
- Dr. Nima Mesgarani and his team are developing
2. Part that is a detail about the subject
- Professor of electrical engineering
3. Part that is the outcome of the main action
- technology that may someday translate people's thought into electronically produced speech.
Explanation:
I have been able to match each sentence to the part the question answers.
In no. 1 you discover that it mentions the name of the subject and his team and also informed us the action they are carrying out: "developing".
In no. 2, we see that the information/detail of the subject was clearly stated, that he is "Professor of electrical engineering".
In no. 3, we are giving the outcome of the main action. The outcome is that the technology that is being developed may someday translate people's thought into electronically produced speech.
D. Both are tools for linking pieces of information at different online locations.
When players on the St. Louis Cardinals team threatened to strike if Robinson took the field, commissioner Ford Frick quashed the strike, countering that any player who did so would be suspended from baseballPee Wee Reese left his position on the field and put an arm around Robinson in a show of solidarity when fan heckling became intolerable, and the two men became lifelong friends.
Answer:
There are many different factors that affect workplace productivity.
Explanation:
Answer:
In certain situations, it can be affirmed that science causes damage to nature through its actions. It is that, although science in general at present seeks to improve the quality of life of people (and, therefore, improve the conditions of the natural environment), in many situations scientific action generates the opposite effect. Thus, for example, scientific advances in the exploitation of resources, while optimizing their use, harm nature by being invasive means for it (for example, fracking to extract oil).
