Brooker T. Washington is very clear about how silly the segregation laws are.
He specifies that the fact that segregation coming from black people would be treated as a stigma, as a bad thing and as a crime, therefore it can't be legal.
In addition, he can't really see the point of making laws that forbid interracial relationships for the sake of not mixing races. Even if they really wanted to prevent the races to be mixed, he pointed out to the fact that the races didn't share the same social spaces. Many times, not even physical spaces.
He also mentions that there's no such a thing as white people suffering because of a black neighborhood nearby. He says that he can use the white people from the South as an example of how silly that sort of comment is.
In the end, he condemned the fact that the laws exist not because he believes that many blacks want to be mixed socially with whites, but mostly because a law that promotes segregation is something that just should not exist.
Answer:
"The Battle of Antietam was one of the most important events of the American Civil War. ... The battle ended the Confederate invasion of Maryland in 1862 and resulted in a Union victory. It also led to President Abraham Lincoln issuing the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862."
D many immigrants struggled to speak and understand the English language
<span>spoke out vigorously against what Henry Clay called the american system.--Madison believed federal money should not be used to benefit one portion of the country or individuals to make money.
The American System supported a national bank, internal improvements, and the goal of creating an industrial country. Madison attempted to block bills which would give tax dollars to creating canals, roads, and other improvements to help trade. </span>
Answer:True
Explanation:
In "Enemies of Conservation" author Mark Dowie argued that when biologists and environmentalists think about the issue of biodiversity they often don't include the indigenous people that have lived in the region for thousands of years. AS mentioned in enemies of conservation we also see that conservation biologists argue that by allowing native populations to grow, hunt, and gather in protected areas, anthropologists, cultural preservationists, and other supporters of indigenous rights become complicit in the decline of biological diversity.
