Answer:
Its A idealzized view of the future
Explanation:
This is called Gerrymandering.
its name comes from a politician Gerry who first prepared a gerrymandered map. It can regroup a district so that without changing the votes of the people one or the other party wins, for example if it distributes the democrats into many districts where they are a minority - their votes will "disappear", they will not have any representation, because they are a minority in each district, However, if all those votes are in the same district, they would be a majority in this district and have some representation<span />
The title, "Sultan" was used as a title for Muslim sovereigns and Maḥmūd of Ghazni (998–1030) was the first Muslim ruler to be conferred with the title.
Who is Mahmud of Ghazni?
Sebüktigin, a Turkish slave who ruled Ghazni and founded the Ghaznavid dynasty in 977, had a son named Mahmud , who was 27 years old when he became king in 998. Mahmud had already demonstrated exceptional leadership and management skills from an early age. Ghazni was a minor kingdom when he became king. The young and aspirational Mahmud amassed the resources necessary to build a vast empire that eventually included the Kashmir and Punjab provinces as well as a significant portion of Iran in more than 20 successful expeditions.
In conclusion, Mahmud was an exceptional king of Ghazni and was the first to use the title of Sultan.
Learn more about Mahmud of Ghazni here:
brainly.com/question/2441442
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
How was the title of Sultan, a common title for a Muslim ruler, first used and with whom?
A. Mongol Batu Khan as he led Mongol Empire.
B. Emporer Constantine, as an honorarium from the people of Constantinople
C. Seljuck leader Beg led the Seljuck Turks yet remained loyal to the Abbasid caliph in Baghdad so another title of leadership was instated.
D. Ghaznavid ruler Mahmud spread Islam deep into India yet didn't hold power long.
One party may feel like the government is "disregarding the rights of another or the good of the whole" (Madison). Therefore creating conflict between the two <span>parties; also creating conflict within the country.</span>
The answer to your question is,
When Washington said that the United States would be "friendly and impartial" in regard to foreign conflicts he was , in essence, saying that the United States would remain neutral.
-Mabel <3
