The answer is for the question is B.
Answer:
C. "She should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way."
Explanation:
I think this one is correct, however I am not positive, it's really just a guess. The first sentence is common knowledge and you shouldn't need to add what the readers already know if it's the main idea. The second sentence isn't necessarily common knowledge and should always be cited.
Hope this helped, let me know if it's right or not.
Answer:
Well, maybe if we had more information about the question/answers than we would be able to help.
Explanation:
Explanation:
In the poem, we note an interesting detail in the last two lines as to why the old woman sees herself as a "terrible fish". The line says,
<em>"In me she has drowned a young girl, and in me an old woman / Rises toward her day after day, like a terrible fish."</em>
The woman uses such expressions above to show that with the passage of time, her youthfulness like a drowning fish has passed away, bringing old age.
By comparing herself to a fish, she symbolizes her aging self to a fish on land seeking survival after it is taken from its natural habitat.
By using the expression "terrible" she depicts her hopeless condition as regards becoming young again, just as a fish taken from water enters a terrible situation.
An author trying to generate particular feelings would use connotation
Connotations give feelings that surpass the literal meanings that they represent. It is a contrast to the word "denotation" that represents the literary idea or meaning of a word.
Therefore, an author can generate a particular feeling in his audience or readers by employing the use of connotations.
Other options do not represent the generation of certain feelings in audience
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17063218
