Hello,
This is a timeline of events related to the Spanish American wars of independence<span>. Numerous wars against </span>Spanish rule<span> in </span>Spanish America<span> took place during the early 19th century, from 1808 until 1829, directly related to the </span>Napoleonic French invasion of Spain<span>. The conflict started with short-lived </span>governing juntas<span> established in </span>Chuquisaca<span> and </span>Quito<span> opposing the composition of the </span>Supreme Central Junta of Seville<span>. When the Central Junta fell to the French, </span>numerous new Juntas<span> appeared all across the Americas, eventually resulting in a chain of newly independent countries stretching from </span>Argentina<span> and </span>Chile<span> in the south, to </span>Mexico<span> in the north. After the death of the king </span>Ferdinand VII<span>, in 1833, only </span>Cuba<span> and </span>Puerto Rico<span> remained under </span>Spanish rule<span>, until the </span>Spanish–American War<span> in 1898.
</span>
Hope this helps!!
~Girlygir101~
Answer:
The naturalistic methodological approach is sometimes rejected in the field of psychology on the basis that psychological events possess attributes that do not exist in purely natural events. One of the characteristics of the psychological is its intentionality. Starting from the distinction between the basic psychological processes and the behavioral products that emerge from them, it is proposed that the former constitute a proper field of natural science but that: nevertheless, they lead to the generation of theories capable of explaining intentional behavior.
Psychology is the study of individual behavior, that is, it is the investigation of processes that occur in the individual, such as perception or learning. In psychology, therefore, you should necessarily focus on possibly universal processes
natural science methods and goals are probably not useful for studying people and social behavior; Instead of explaining to people and society, research should aim at understanding human behavior ... In this vision, the most interesting questions are not about the "reality of the world, but about people's interpretations of it.
Intentional behavior, such as contingencies of reinforcement, educational experience or the current social context, we can see that a “causal” approach cannot easily be rejected. For example, we can see that a behavior now occurs because in the past it was followed by certain consequences. However, even recognizing the presence of such causes, the interpretationist researcher will insist that they influence the behavior only to the extent that they have any meaning for the individual and according to the intentions and motives that he harbors (and hence the same "causes" influence different individuals differently). Ultimately, then, the most important factors lie in these meanings, intentions and motives.
Answer: laugh in a breathy, gleeful way; chuckle.
Answer:
THIS IS ALL ORIGINAL!!!!!! I DID NOT COPY OR ANYTHING OF THE SORT!!!!!
Explanation:
Poem:
Dear Mother,
Thank you.
If it weren't for your love,
I wouldn't be able to soar like a dove!
If it weren't for your warm hugs,
I would've lived like a bug.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart,
as I bestow upon you this sweet cherry tart!
Haiku:
Thank you for everything,
I owe my life to you... Now,
I can dream the impossible!
