This problems needs an image!!
Answer:
0.0011904
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Number of slips = 7
Sample space = (1, 2, 3, 3, 5, 6, 7)
Numbwe of slips drawn = 4
Probability = required outcome / Total possible outcomes
Note ; selection is without replacement ;
P(drawing 1) = 1 /7
P(drawing 2) = 1 /6
P(drawing 3) = 1/5
P(drawing 4) = 1/4
1/7 * 1/6 * 1/5 * 1/4 = 0.0011904
<h3>
Answers</h3><h3>diameter = 14</h3><h3>radius = 7</h3><h3>area = 154</h3>
these are all approximate
======================================
Explanation:
C = pi*d is the formula for the circumference. We know that C = 44 approximately, so,
C = pi*d
d = C/pi
d = 44/3.14
d = 14.01 approximately
d = 14 also approximate
take half of this to get the radius
r = d/2 = 14/2 = 7
Then use this radius to find the circle's area
A = pi*r^2
A = 3.14*7^2
A = 153.86
A = 154 rounding to the nearest whole number
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.