The role of government in a free enterprise system is to allow individuals to operate their businesses in ways they think that will minimize their profits.
A free enterprise system <em>is one that is based on personal businesses in which they compete to sell their products and are free to obtain any possible benefit. </em>It is different from state-run systems such as communism where the state government controls all business and does not allow large profits to be made. The free enterprise system also allows open or very lightly regulated trade, although it regulates business when the public interest is involved.
The foundation for creation of a two-party system in the United States was led by Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the end of the 18th century.
<h3>What is a two-party system?</h3>
A system when there are two political parties in a nation, which fight over power and control of the national governance, it is known as a two-party system.
In a two-party system, the party in power is known as a ruling party and the other party is known as an opposition party.
Hence, the significance of a two-party system is aforementioned.
Learn more about two-party system here:
brainly.com/question/12069536
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Quakers allowed women to become preachers and speak publicly.
Explanation:
The Quakers were different from other religious groups in America in the 1600s as they "allowed women to become preachers and speak publicly."
The Quakers were known for having a lot of differences in terms of doctrine compared to other protestants in America, one of which is their style of worship in which instead of worshiping in a church, they convene in a meeting house, where people only talk or preach of they are directed by God. The individual speaker could be either male or female.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is "The Quakers allowed women to become preachers and speak publicly."
Answer: A. The colonies were trying to re-establish peace with Great Britain and avoid further fighting.
Explanation:
The American Colonists did not want to go to war with King George III of England and Britain at the time because they believed that the abusive acts that Parliament had imposed on them, was done without his consent and that he would come to their defence if they went directly to him.
They therefore in 1775, sent the Olive branch petition to King George to re-establish peace with Great Britain and avoid further fighting which they were sure would lead to numerous deaths as well as to avoid rebellion to the King whom they still longed to be subjects of.
When the King refused to even read the petition, it then occurred to the Colonists that Parliament was acting with royal consent which then made them angry with the King such that they blamed him for their secession in the Declaration of Independence.
Yes I think the Allies would have won World War 1 because they would have beaten China.
