Answer:
If you encounter a fire, a portable fire extinguisher can help protect you and possibly stop the fire in its tracks. This article covers how portable fire extinguishers work and how to use them.
Secure Your Exit
The first and most important purpose of a portable fire extinguisher is to help people escape. Portable fire extinguishers can clear fire away from your escape route or help keep an exit open for others. You should know where extinguishers are located and how to operate them. This helps ensure safe evacuations.
Fight the Fire
The second purpose of a portable fire extinguisher is to fully extinguish fires. This requires training. Portable fire extinguishers cannot extinguish large fires. Many employers do not want their employees fighting fires no matter the size. If this is the case, the extinguishers in your workplace may only be for protecting escape routes. If your employer wants you to fight small fires, they will train you.
Types of Fire Extinguishers
Fire extinguishers are rated to fight different classes of fire. Most extinguishers are rated to fight A, B and C fires, but not all. Make sure the fire extinguisher you use will work on the fire you’re facing. The wrong extinguisher could make things worse.
Extent to which the demand<span> for a good changes when income changes.</span>
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
- The US federal government which had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Explanation:
When unexpected inflation occurs, the usual plan to by Monetary Institutions of a country is raising the interest rates.
By doing that, they want to stop it or slowly decelerate it.
So that it becomes more expensive to take a loan, the idea is to reduce consumption.
In Economics, it's a bad scenario after all. Few winners. Many losers.
So, let's examine them
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
At first, The 3rd National is going to be winning since the value of the debt will rise, depending on the type of contract and an increase in the interest rate will demand corrections on the monthly payments. But on the other hand, the number of default clients and overdue installments will raise for sure.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
Inflation reduces the real buying value of her checks. And her pension can't grow otherwise this will feed the inflation too.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
Since his money is not invested then He's not having any earning that might give him some compensation. So his money is even more devalued.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
Depending on the contract Joy might be sleepless. Either her monthly payments will become more expensive or She may experience difficulties because of the weekly growing prices.
- The US federal government had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Certainly, the president and his secretary will have to address the fact that due to inflation and the chosen medicine make the nation's debt up to the sky. They must renegotiate the payment deadlines.
The study of an agent's or individual's decisions is known as decision theory. The official decision-making process concludes with evaluation. Evaluating the consequences may assist the decision-maker in learning lessons that will help her make better decisions in the future.
- Loss aversion is the correct answer because the general notion of the "loss-aversion" theory is that if an individual is provided with two equal alternatives, one of which is presented in terms of prospective profits and the other in terms of potential losses, the former option will be chosen.
- Loss aversion is a cognitive bias or psychological phenomenon that explains why the agony of losing is twice as powerful psychologically as the pleasure of winning.
Therefore, representativeness, cognitive bias, and overconfidence are not factors relative to an arbitrary decision distortion. So, Loss aversion is the correct response to the question.
For more information regarding arbitrary baseline, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/11224360
