Answer:
the answer is on photomath
Answer:
8 9/10
Step-by-step explanation:
89 goes into 10 8 times.
8x10=80.
89-80=9
So the answer is 8 9/10
well, if the diameter is 5, thus its radius must be half that, or 2.5, and therefore, the radius of the one four times as much will be (4)(2.5).
Let's simply get their difference, since that'd be how much more is needed from the smaller to larger sphere.
![~\hfill \stackrel{\textit{surface area of a sphere}}{SA=4\pi r^2}\qquad \qquad r=radius~\hfill \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{\textit{\large difference of their areas}}{\stackrel{\textit{radius of (4)(2.5)}}{4\pi (4)(2.5)^2}~~ - ~~\stackrel{\textit{radius of 2.5}}{4\pi (2.5)^2}}\implies 100\pi -25\pi \implies 75\pi ~~ \approx ~~235.62~ft^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=~%5Chfill%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsurface%20area%20of%20a%20sphere%7D%7D%7BSA%3D4%5Cpi%20r%5E2%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20r%3Dradius~%5Chfill%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7B%5Clarge%20difference%20of%20their%20areas%7D%7D%7B%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bradius%20of%20%284%29%282.5%29%7D%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%284%29%282.5%29%5E2%7D~~%20-%20~~%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bradius%20of%202.5%7D%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%282.5%29%5E2%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20100%5Cpi%20-25%5Cpi%20%5Cimplies%2075%5Cpi%20~~%20%5Capprox%20~~235.62~ft%5E2)
So this one is pretty easy actually when x= a number you automatically know it'll be a vertical line cutting through the x axis. So for this problem (x=5) the line will be vertical and cut through the x axis. Hope this helps!
Answer:
as explained
Step-by-step explanation:
as in the photo i've shown :
i've shown the table for you both
i've shown the graph for one only the second one hope you can complete it if you have any questions you can ask.
for first one
if x=2 replace x=2 in f(x) you will get f(2)=4
f(3)=1
f(4)=0
f(5)=1
f(6)=4
Why did I start with x=2 and not x=1 because f(1)=9 in the graph provided there is no marking for y=9 but when drawing the graph extends it (as in photo 3 not as in photo 4)(graph in photo 3 is better)
Hope you understand(you can also put(2,4) ,(3,1) and so on in the graph as in photo 5