Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
Answer:
The correct answer is option B. "Citizens have a right to revolt and replace an existing government that becomes oppressive".
Explanation:
John Locke was a 17th century Englishman who serves as an inspiration for the founding of the United States. The idea of John Locke that most influenced the development of self-government in the American colonies was that citizens have a right to revolt and replace an existing government that becomes oppressive. John Locke believed that all governments must provide the natural rights of the citizens, which are: life, liberty, and property. Since American colonies not had liberty or property, they had the right to revolt and replace their existing government.
J. No. I o u u u look iokkoooo. In n in n. Ok o. P lmk mom
<span>The broadest and most open gateway to participation is offered to the American people by political parties.
If you want to engage in any type of political activity, you will have to become a member of one of the political parties. That is probably the only way to have any influence when it comes to politics, and to participate in the political life of America.
</span>
I believe the best answer is A) Johnson was too lenient on the Confederate leaders.
I hope this helped
