The correct answer is C. the parties themselves.
Explanation:
A panel representing each party chooses someone for committees assignments. Republicans make a seniority formula to choose a nominated person, while Democrats nominate people on a seat by seat basis.
In Louisiana Jury decision need not be unanimous.
Explanation:
Each and every Juror need not be convinced for the defendant' guilt. If the judges claim to be of similar opinion then the guilt proves to be reasonable but its not the majority of the judges opinion. Judges love this process as it expedites the deliberations and most of the cases are solved faster.
Unanimity is required in all criminal cases which are of third degree severity. In a state where the racial disparity is to the maximum and unanimity of jury persists then, there are many chances for the defendant to be convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole based upon a 10-2 vote of the jury decisions.
It allowed Missouri to be a slave state.
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Unless the juror could refer to evidence which proved the boy had committed the crime, then that view is invalid. Such labelling, present in the film, showed the dangers in pre-judging an individual. The film was taking a liberal view of society and justice personified by Henry Fonda against the widespread conservative prejudices of his fellow jurors.
Answer: A. The Supreme Court ruled that agencies enforcing the act were
defining "disability" too broadly.
Explanation: During the 1980’s, it became clear to the disability community that it should play a very active role in Supreme Court litigation under Section 504. The first Section 504 case which was decided by the Supreme Court in 1979, Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S.397, revealed at best, a lack of understanding, and also a hostility toward even applying the concept of discrimination to exclusion based on disability. In that case, a hearing impaired women was seeking admission to the nursing program of Southeastern Community College. The court found that Ms. Davis’s hearing impairment disqualified her to participate in the program because she would not be able to fulfill all of the clinical requirements. However, the Court did not limit itself to the fate of Ms. Davis, but included within the decision several very broad negative interpretations of Section 504.
