Answer: They didn't believe government had the authority to tax.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. a private good or a club good.
Explanation:
People can be prevented from using a private good or a club good because they are excludable goods.
Excludable goods or services are goods that public can be prevented from using or enjoying. On the contrary, non excludable goods are those goods and services that it is impossible to prevent the public from using/enjoying. Examples of excludable goods are private properties such as a personal phone, fish in a fish farm, the services of a gym or golf club. examples of nonexcludable goods are fish in a public river, the services of the police, a concert on a national television network.
Answer:
A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.
Explanation:
The researchers' maintained a point of view that, the low levels of the drugs found in the water poses no significant threat to public health.
Therefore their reasoning would be most strengthened by the answer "A" chosen above because it implies that;
low levels of the drugs have been present in water over time, and yet, no health effects have been detected previously. Therefore, even if the technology to detect such low levels of the drugs is now available, it shouldn't change the fact that such levels of the drug is still not a significant health hazard.
Answer:
Well, first of all, they were very busy! My grandmother was 11 in 1916, and she told me once that even though they had a maid they were constantly doing stuff -- cooking from scratch, sewing, putting up preserves. Automobiles were just becoming known, so many would have had horses to watch out for -- and many more people still worked on the farm. Hours in industrial employment were long, and the work week was six days rather than five.
Explanation:
