Answer:
Income
Explanation:
Suppose the market wage for cashiers increases from $7 per hour to $9 per hour. As a result, Pat, who is a cashier, now works five more hours per week. On the other hand Chris, who is also a cashier, now works five fewer hours per week.Chris's behavior illustrates the <u>Income</u> effect of a wage increase.
As the income increases, few individual prefer to work fewer hours as now they are able to maintain target by working fewer than at previous wage rate. These people prefer leisure over higher income and want to settle down with limited income. These people may have a backward bending individual labour supply curve – they may choose to work fewer hours when the wage rate rises.
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
A) there are no close substitutes
Explanation:
A monopoly results when there is a single provider of a particular good or service. Since they’re the only company providing that good or service, the consumer must conduct their business with that specific provider. For example, imagine that Walmart is the only store you can buy food from. Walmart would dominate the entire supply market as it would be the only store from which you can buy your food.
The Accumulated depreciation account had a balance of $144000
<h3>What is
Accumulated depreciation?</h3>
Accumulated depreciation is the total amount of a company's asset depreciation, whereas depreciation expense is the amount depreciated for a single period. Depreciation is an accounting entry that represents the decrease in the cost of an asset over its useful life.
Accumulated depreciation is the total amount of depreciation that has been expensed against the asset's value. On the balance sheet, fixed assets are recorded as a debit, while accumulated depreciation is recorded as a credit, offsetting the asset.
Accumulated depreciation accounts are credit-balanced asset accounts (known as a contra asset account). It is classified as a contra asset account because it has a negative balance that is intended to offset the asset account with which it is paired, resulting in a negative balance.
To know more about Accumulated depreciation follow the link:
brainly.com/question/17167938
#SPJ4
59 years old
Hope I got it right for you good luck
