Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"While exploring a rock formation, Hiroto finds a rock that has footprints pressed into it. A geologist tells Hiroto that the rock is millions of years old. Which of these statements is correct about Hiroto’s find?
A.It is not a fossil, because footprints are not fossils. B.It is not a fossil, because only whole organisms are fossils. C.It is a fossil only if Hiroto finds actual parts of the organism in rocks nearby. D.It is a fossil because footprints of organisms from million of years ago are considered to be fossils.
"
Answer:
D.It is a fossil because footprints of organisms from million of years ago are considered to be fossils.
Explanation:
Fossils are body remains of animals and plants trapped in rocks for thousands of years. These traces can be parts of the body, body structure, tracks, footprints, among others. An example of this can be seen in the question above, where Hiroto found a mark caused by an animal on a rock. In short, Hiroto found a rock with pressed footprints that is approximately millions of years old. He found a fossil.
Most people didn't want to support them because they didn't think they would be able to defeat Great Britain.
The correct answer is operational definition
Operational Definition is a procedure that assigns a meaning communicable to a concept by specifying how the concept is applied within specific set of circumstances. In another way, an operational definition is an accurate description of what something is and how to obtain a value for this is something we are trying to measure, that is, how to measure it. An operational definition has to be specific, concrete, measurable and useful for the people involved.
By strict definition, 'faith' is not an emotion - becasue 'belief' is not an emotion. If people have 'belief' in something that is not based on proof, then their steadfast faith may be based on an emotion, but that does not make their faith an emotion. The english language is malleable and defined by common usage
Answer:
<em>Deception</em>
Explanation:
Deception
In research deception is a dishonest way of conduction research, in which the participants are given different information about a study. The participant of such research is not aware of the reason why such an analysis is carried out until the outcome is known. Deception in the researcher can also be intentionally withholding of some of the vital information needed for the participants to carry out the research effectively.
An illustration
Deception some times is used by the researcher to obtain accurate information. In our illustration, the researcher wants to study cheating, and he employs deception. The researcher opted for deception so that by withholding the true knowledge, the participants would act naturally. The above is a clear case of deception by the researcher
