Answer:
4. both a and c
Explanation:
because they were both written by someone who was there during the event (its a first hand experience)
People need to believe they have equal social and political rights, else there would be mass protests, revolutions and anarchy. Whether they actually exist in real life is irrelevant here, only the belief matters.
The primary difference in the social structures of humans and animals is the forced imposition of order in human society, leading to a more 'collective' society, instead of the usual 'survival of the fittest/law of the jungle' structure.
And the concept of equal rights is necessary to achieve this imposition of order.
In my opinion, a human society following 'law of the jungle' would be unsustainable, simply because humans as a species are too weak to survive as individuals. The greatest strength of our species is our mental faculty. This leads to the sum of the parts being greater than the whole. As individuals though, we would fail to harness this strength.
Therefore, equal rights do offer us an evolutionary advantage, since they allow us to cluster together, and grow as a population, which is the only way for us to survive.
Answer:
The country will not survive unless all thirteen states ratify Constitution.
Explanation:
There was a political debate that occur then in the United States. The Constitution make sure that there would be a strong federal government capable of taxing, waging war, and making law, which can never resolve the Americas issues.
Cartoons was use then in the 1787 to represent the ratification of Constitution of the 13 states.
The Massachusetts centinel uses different form of cartoons to draw ratification of Constitution. From the cartoons, each vertical pillar represent states that has ratified the new government Constitution. The cartoons shows that the thirteen states are the pillar that holds United States of America and this signify that the country will not survive unless all the thirteenth states ratified the Constitution.
Answer:
Arnold was killed and Montgomery was wounded in the seize of Quebec.
Explanation:
During the Battle of Quebec, on 31st of December 31, 1775, Colonel Benedict Arnold and General Richard Montgomery failed the capture Quebec.
<u>In the process of Quebec seizure, Montgomery was killed, and Arnold was wounded</u> (he later died in 1801.) The option placed here suggests it was another way around, which is why it isn't true.
During the war, the British army did gain control of Canada and it is considered to be one of the biggest losses of the American army in history.
