Why would the rumor of a government contract change the value of this companys stock

History

1 answer:

stira [4]3 years ago

7 0

The correct answer is: "The value of the stock will INCREASE".

If the rumor is confirmed and a goverment contract is signed, it means that the company has been hired to provide a certain predetermined amount of a product or service. Hence, such contract ensures a certain amount of sales and profits and, as a consequence, potential investors would increase the demand of stock from the company because they expect (from a very reliable source) that the firm would be able to pay good dividens derived from the goverment contract. This would increase the value and market price of the stock.

You might be interested in

Will someone help me

EleoNora [17]

Picture of your problem?

4 0

3 years ago

Europe's ancient regimes, or old governments, used a heavy-handed, authoritarian style of rule based on the belief that kings an

Solnce55 [7]

Answer:

Popular sovereignty

6 0

4 years ago

I for five hours every day last week worked or have worked

saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

I worked for five hours every day last week

4 0

3 years ago

What effect did tariff policies have on the great depression?

azamat

Effects such as the Smoot-Hawley tariff act raised tariffs to and all time high but was actually meant to help but ultimately failed, causing a sped up process towards the Depression.

Hope this helped if theres choices let me know

8 0

3 years ago

What are the strengths and weaknesses of a monarchical system of government?

Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

the strengths are It brings about a solid government. ...

It can lead to leadership stability. ...

It offers more savings for the government with the absence of elections. ...

It allows for a non-partisan leadership. ...

It encourages respect for the ruler. ...

It lessens cases of corrupt practices.

weaknesses are It might lead to a poor leadership. ...

It does not allow democratic legitimacy. ...

It might lead to having a leader who might not be as serious as needed. ...

It lacks democratic accountability and liability. ...

It invests much power and fame to a single individual.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago