How was the war powers resolution intended to limit presidential authority

2 answers:

8 0

The main way in which the War Powers Resolution was intended to limit presidential authority was that it limited the number of days a President could commit US troops to a conflict without the express authority of Congress.

tiny-mole [99]2 years ago

6 0

The War Powers Resolution demands that the President informs Congress within 48 hours that they have entered a military engagement by committing troops overseas.

It also stipulates that these troops cannot be engaged in this conflict for more than sixty days without authorization from Congress.

So, as we can see, it limits presidential authority by granting the Congress some of the power over the troops, and by demanding the that the president informs them about military engagement.

You might be interested in

How close did the new nation come to ending slavery

yaroslaw [1]

Well assuming you mean America, and not considering Civil War, I would say the draft of the Constitution Thomas Jefferson want to make slavery illegal, but he needed the southern states approval.

8 0

2 years ago

The purpose of the _____ principle of joint operations is to concentrate the effects of combat power at the most advantageous pl

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

correct option is mass

Explanation:

solution

It is one of the nine principles of war situation , it is used by US armed force.

they are

Objective
Offensive
Mass
Movement
Surprise
Security
Economy of Force
Cooperation
Simplicity

in the war all these element of combat power synchronized so they can create an effect in small time on the enemy

mass principle allows army to limit exposure to enemy fire

and mass principle can enable numerically inferior force rather than the concentrating force

so correct option is mass

3 0

2 years ago

what sources of capital are available today for people who have lost their business or jobs because of the pandemic?

olchik [2.2K]

Unemployment check is what I think it is

3 0

2 years ago

How would have American imperialists MOST likely react to the political cartoon?

Pachacha [2.7K]

This question refers to the cartoon by john FM, and the answer is <span>D) They would disagree with the cartoon because they believed colonizing was beneficial and helped the people who were colonized.
Imperialist believe that colonization is similar to spreading out business investment to smaller nations.
According to their point of view by injecting investment to the colonies, the people in that nation now had the opportunity to get capital and improve their wealth to build their own nations</span>

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did Arab nations respond to the establishment of the nation of Israel?

Olegator [25]

I believe it was A, if I'm not mistaking.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers