Answer:
Combined Beta = 1
Combined return = 10%
Explanation:
given data
stock portfolio = $50,000
beta = 1.2
expected return = 10.8%
beta = 0.8
expected return = 9.2%
standard deviation = 25%
to find out
combination
solution
we get here first Combined Beta that is express as
Combined Beta = 1.2 × 50% + 0.8 × 50%
Combined Beta = 1
and
Combined return will be here
Combined return = 10.8 × 50% + 9.2 × 50%
Combined return = 10%
Answer: True
Explanation:
Yes, the given statement is true that the employing capital rationing is one of the process in which it placing some restriction on the investment amount of the project in an organization.
In the capital rationing strategy, if the company accepts less amount from all its prospective projects along with some positive net profit value (NPVs) the it is evaluated on the basis of their own risk.
The employ capital rationing helps in making various types of decisions related to investment for the company and in this system only limited projects are taken due to the limitation of the resources.
Therefore, The given statement is true.
Answer:
The correct answer is: B. Bountiful and expected to continue to grow.
The tourism and hospitality industry is a fast growing and developing industry, so in the future, it is expected to grow, and become more bountiful.
Let me know if this helps!
Answer:
$56,520
Explanation:
As per given data
Year Sales Working Capital 18%
0 $279,000 ($50,220)
1 $308,000 ($5,220)
2 $314,000 ($1,080)
3 $314,000 $0
4 $314,000 $56,520
As the sales value of year 2, 3 and 4 are same, as capital is adjusted in year 2 and company has equal working capital required in year 3, years 4 is the last year of the project so, working capital will be recovered from the project
Net Working capital will be reimbursed at the end of the project. The accumulated value of investment in working capital will be recorded as cash inflow in the analysis.
Non-price competition in a monopolistic-ally competitive market is Andy experiencing
Explanation:
The profitability of non-prices applies to the attempts of a dominant corporation to raise its sales and profits by variating goods and production rates instead of lowering the product prices.
Either by modifying the physical attributes or through changes to advertising schemes, a dominant rival may always change his goods.
Varying inventory and distribution prices reduce the company's demand curve and increase production costs.
As a consequence, there will also be a change in the amount of income the organization will gain from extracting the volume of the commodity that equates the MR to MC.
